2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17458-2_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility-Based Bounds Tightening via Fixed Points

Abstract: Abstract. The search tree size of the spatial Branch-and-Bound algorithm for Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming depends on many factors, one of which is the width of the variable ranges at every tree node. A range reduction technique often employed is called Feasibility Based Bounds Tightening, which is known to be practically fast, and is thus deployed at every node of the search tree. From time to time, however, this technique fails to converge to its limit point in finite time, thereby slowing the whole Br… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly as |I i | and |I j | approach ∞, the error terms of the McCormick envelopes, E( l i , l j ) and E( l i , u j ), approach zero, and thus enforcing x i = x * i , 4 Exhaustiveness of the partitioning scheme implies AMP will eventually partition all other domains small enough such that AMP will pick an active partition with the global optimal whose length is ≤ l i + u i .…”
Section: Computing Lower and Upper Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly as |I i | and |I j | approach ∞, the error terms of the McCormick envelopes, E( l i , l j ) and E( l i , u j ), approach zero, and thus enforcing x i = x * i , 4 Exhaustiveness of the partitioning scheme implies AMP will eventually partition all other domains small enough such that AMP will pick an active partition with the global optimal whose length is ≤ l i + u i .…”
Section: Computing Lower and Upper Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent method by Belotti [71] uses pairs of constraints instead of individual constraints to infer bounds. Different techniques have been developed to infer bounds on MILP problems [62,63], and on MINLP problems [64,72]. To illustrate this method consider the constraint x 3 = T and x up = (4, 2, 4) T .…”
Section: Feasibility-based Bound Tighteningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, however, is rarely true if bound tightening techniques [26,18,19,27] are used as a preprocessing step; and it is never true during sBB with rectangular partitioning schemes, as the variable ranges are partitioned at each node. We also emphasize that the remark given in [8] p. 11 is also valid in our setting: for polynomial degrees ≥ 3, the proposed convex relaxation might not be monotonically increasing w.r.t.…”
Section: Choosing a Good Basis For The Companion Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%