2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00785.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility and usefulness of self‐assessment of bleeding in patients with haematological malignancies, and the association between platelet count and bleeding

Abstract: Patient self-assessment can help to support comprehensive daily prospective monitoring of bleeding, specifically facilitating data collection following hospital discharge. The discrepancies between self-assessment and medical examination highlight the need to develop a validated international assessment tool. The association among platelet count, risk of bleeding and role of prophylactic platelet transfusions needs further evaluation in larger prospective trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is 86% agreement between bleeding data collected by self-assessment and by clinical examination. 21 In conclusion, this study demonstrated that severe hemorrhage is rare but can occur anywhere and at any time during the course of ITP. The majority of Chinese children with ITP should be observed without specific therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…There is 86% agreement between bleeding data collected by self-assessment and by clinical examination. 21 In conclusion, this study demonstrated that severe hemorrhage is rare but can occur anywhere and at any time during the course of ITP. The majority of Chinese children with ITP should be observed without specific therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Grade 1 bleeding is regarded as not clinically significant since it does not require intervention; however, it does inconvenience the patient and may be a forerunner of more severe bleeding [27]. Grade 2 bleeding is deemed to be clinically significant, but it is hard to distinguish from grade 1 bleeding even when trained and blinded assessors are used [28–30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To some extent, any outcome measure based on the frequency and description of bleeding events requires a subjective assessment by the trialists. This inherently subjective component in the ascertainment of the outcome measure makes systematic recording and standardization of bleeding complications difficult [28–30, 33]. Even in RCTs, there is potential for bias if clinicians are making subjective decisions about the severity of bleeding complications and the need to transfuse platelets and/or RBCs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In most studies the physical assessment was performed once in a 24‐hour period; however, one study performed assessment three times each day 9 . Independent research by two groups also investigated whether patients could accurately perform their own bleeding assessments 10,11 . Once the signs and symptoms of bleeding were collected, a grade using the WHO scale had to be applied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%