1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00525-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility and tolerance of pulsed dose rate interstitial brachytherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Acute severe skin and oral mucosa effects were seen in 6.8% and 13.6% of patients, respectively. Acute mucositis (grade 2 or 3) after PDR iBT in 23.5-25% of patients was also reported by others [5,19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Acute severe skin and oral mucosa effects were seen in 6.8% and 13.6% of patients, respectively. Acute mucositis (grade 2 or 3) after PDR iBT in 23.5-25% of patients was also reported by others [5,19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Both LDR and HDR BT have long been used for head and neck tumors [1, 3, 7, 8, 12-15, 17, 23, 25]. Recently, PDR BT was reported to be an effective and safe therapy, also performed postoperatively, as well as a unique treatment for reirradiated head-and-neck tumors [5,16,[18][19][20]24]. We also demonstrated the feasibility of PDR iBT and PDR cBT in such patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…de Pree et al [20] presented a series of 43 patients treated with PDR brachytherapy, but only 2 cases had primary EC. Overall, the dose per pulse varied between 0.4 and 1 Gy/h.…”
Section: Clinical Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%