2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03508-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility and suitability of the routine use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hirotani et al [13] observed no difference in the incidence of chest wound infection in 200 patients with BITA and 43 patients with unilateral ITA grafting, although 127 diabetic patients were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Hirotani et al [13] observed no difference in the incidence of chest wound infection in 200 patients with BITA and 43 patients with unilateral ITA grafting, although 127 diabetic patients were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…After 10 years, patency rate of LITA amounts to about 90% versus only 50-60% for saphenous veins, resulting in improved long-term survival of patients receiving LITA [1,[2][3][4][5][11][12][13]16,17,15]. An additional benefit concerning longterm morbidity and mortality was described after a surgical technique revascularizing preferentially left-sided coronary arteries (LAD and circumflex artery) with both ITAs [1,3,5,11,14,15].One of our studies, concerning angiographic findings in midterm follow-up (mean 2.7 years) of 663 symptomatic patients, showed the unambiguous superior patency of ITA, especially BITA grafts to saphenous veins in a negative-selected, symptomatic large patient population [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…11 Most recent reports have supported the use of bilateral ITAs because of improved long-term results. 12,13 Therefore, use of bilateral ITAs may become a routine procedure in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%