The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-2824.2011.01470.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility and safety of multicomponent apheresis donation

Abstract: Background and Objectives Modern apheresis devices offer the possibility to collect blood components that are well standardized, as compared with those available with manual whole blood donations. Recent technologic advances in multicomponent donation have made possible the development of systems that can collect different blood components from the same donor during one apheresis session. Red blood cells (RBCs) can be concurrently collected with plasma or platelets (PLTs).Materials and Methods A PLT yield of ‡… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first developed in the 1970s for therapeutic use, and RBC apheresis for autologous and allogeneic transfusions were approved by the FDA between 1995 and 1997, and by Europe in 2000 6 . Two‐unit RBC apheresis is considered to be safe and has some advantages over traditional whole‐blood donation 8–16 . For both allogeneic and autologous donors, two‐unit RBC apheresis can obtain an equivalent number of RBC units with less times of collection compared with traditional whole‐blood donation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first developed in the 1970s for therapeutic use, and RBC apheresis for autologous and allogeneic transfusions were approved by the FDA between 1995 and 1997, and by Europe in 2000 6 . Two‐unit RBC apheresis is considered to be safe and has some advantages over traditional whole‐blood donation 8–16 . For both allogeneic and autologous donors, two‐unit RBC apheresis can obtain an equivalent number of RBC units with less times of collection compared with traditional whole‐blood donation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Two-unit RBC apheresis is considered to be safe and has some advantages over traditional whole-blood donation. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] For both allogeneic and autologous donors, two-unit RBC apheresis can obtain an equivalent number of RBC units with less times of collection compared with traditional whole-blood donation. In terms of donor safety, owing to the return of plasma, slow collection rate, saline replacement, and small extracorporeal volume, two-unit RBC apheresis has a lower incidence of hypovolemia than whole-blood donation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technical advances facilitated the collection of various blood components during one apheresis session [1–3]. The practice of multicomponent collection (MCC) provides standardized products at high quality but with lower costs [4], and reducing the donor exposure for patients may decrease the risk for transfusion‐related side effects [5]. So far, reliable data about regeneration of donor blood parameters after apheresis, in particular after MCC, have been limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%