2021
DOI: 10.1080/0361073x.2021.1894072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility and Psychometric Integrity of Mobile Phone-Based Intensive Measurement of Cognition in Older Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This discrepancy is likely due to the strong relationship between initial performance and practice effects reflecting a regression to the mean effect. With additional assessments, such as what is done in burst designs for digital cognitive assessments that involve high frequency testing over a short time span, 38 scores are expected to eventually converge at the mean, presumably reflecting a more accurate and robust quantification of an individual's ability. Taken together, our results suggest that regression to the mean effects can obscure other important relationships, highlighting the need to factor in initial performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discrepancy is likely due to the strong relationship between initial performance and practice effects reflecting a regression to the mean effect. With additional assessments, such as what is done in burst designs for digital cognitive assessments that involve high frequency testing over a short time span, 38 scores are expected to eventually converge at the mean, presumably reflecting a more accurate and robust quantification of an individual's ability. Taken together, our results suggest that regression to the mean effects can obscure other important relationships, highlighting the need to factor in initial performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some mobile-based assessment tools (e.g., Trail Making Test, MoCA, or MMSE) also demonstrate very good concurrent validity, as evidenced by high correlation against their conventional in-person versions [49,50,55]. Recent studies also show good construct validity of mobile-based assessments through sensitivity to age and education effects, as well as fluid and neuro-imaging biomarkers that index AD progression.…”
Section: Unsupervised Mobile Web-based Cognitive Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there have been few studies conducted on mobile assessments as this field is fairly new, recent studies show that mobile tools can in some cases achieve high between-person reliability (i.e., whether inter-individual differences are comparable over repeated testing) [46 ▪▪ ,50–54] and good test-retest reliability over intervals ranging from several days to several months[46 ▪▪ ,50,55,56 ▪ ]. This suggests that high-frequency measurement can be used with confidence to assess within-person fluctuations in cognitive performance.…”
Section: Unsupervised Mobile Web-based Cognitive Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the tests still manifested sufficient within-person variability to capture cognitive fluctuations between occasions (within-person reliability of 0.41-0.53). Furthermore, smartphone-administered brief cognitive assessment repeated twice a day in multiple short sessions across 12 months could disentangle long-and short-term changes in cognitive performance [104]. Most of the variance in cognitive performance was due to between-person differences and shortterm within-person fluctuations.…”
Section: Remote Repeated Cognitive Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%