2020
DOI: 10.2514/1.a34529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility and Mass-Benefit Analysis of Aerocapture for Missions to Venus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the demonstration of aerocapture at Mars or Venus will enhance its readiness for outer planet missions where its performance benefit is significantly greater [20,21]. Even though aerocapture is not currently considered for the Uranus Orbiter and Probe which is the top priority for the Flagship mission of the next decade [22,23], studies have shown aerocapture offers significant mission design advantages [24].…”
Section: Applications For Future Missionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the demonstration of aerocapture at Mars or Venus will enhance its readiness for outer planet missions where its performance benefit is significantly greater [20,21]. Even though aerocapture is not currently considered for the Uranus Orbiter and Probe which is the top priority for the Flagship mission of the next decade [22,23], studies have shown aerocapture offers significant mission design advantages [24].…”
Section: Applications For Future Missionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rocket Lab has also made the commitment to fly a private mission to deliver a 20 kg probe for in-situ sampling of the Venusian clouds, also using the Photon high-performance spacecraft (shown in Figure 1) with an estimated budget under $10 million [3]. Orbit insertion, particularly to low-circular orbits requires significant propellant and can require about 20-40% of the Photon wet mass and present a significant challenge for small missions [4,5]. Aerocapture can be used to eliminate the substantial propellant need for orbit insertion [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, cost reduction and increases in the capability and availability of launch vehicles (e.g., SLS) could significantly enhance the deliverable mass and thus scope of a New Frontiers-class Uranus orbiter mission, as well as potentially enabling contributed elements from other agencies, while also adding the capability to launch outside of windows with Jupiter gravity assists. Furthermore, the risk versus benefit of using aerocapture for orbit insertion should be analyzed, as it can strongly increase the mass of the delivered payload and shorten flight times (Hall et al 2005;Spilker et al 2016;Girija et al 2020;Dutta et al 2021).…”
Section: Required Mission Design Scope and Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods for comparing aerocapture with traditional propulsive options and aerobraking were also investigated for Venus in Ref. [27]. For human Mars missions, repeated Mars orbit insertion maneuvers warrant the use of aerocapture to save propellant in order to deliver assets to Mars orbit.…”
Section: Aerocapture At Marsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A framework for assessing aerocapture feasibility has been developed and discussed in detail in Ref. [10,27,28] and the results in this section follow the same analysis framework. The key design parameters for aerocapture missions are very similar to those for entry except theoretical corridor width.…”
Section: Aerocapture Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%