2018
DOI: 10.1111/ggi.13459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility and effectiveness of home‐based exercise programs on physical performance and health‐related quality of life of the older people dwelling on an isolated, doctor‐less island

Abstract: Although an isolated island has several problems to support preventive care services, such as a lack of medical resources and availability of only a few healthcare workers, the present study provides evidence on the feasibility and efficacy of nurse-led home-based exercise programs for improving the physical and mental health of the older people dwelling on an isolated, doctor-less island. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 1313-1317.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The timed up and go (TUG) test and the 30 s chair-standing test (CS-30) were performed to assess the physical functions of the participants. The TUG test was performed according to previous reports [14]; the TUG test was conducted twice, and the better value of the two tests was selected as the representative. The participants were asked to sit and stand on a chair with a seat height of 40 cm, as Age-matched community-dwelling older adults were selected as healthy controls using the following inclusion criteria: age of 70 years or older; independently mobile; no chronic pain, including low back pain and lower extremities pain, at present; no visits to clinics or hospital for treatment of chronic pain within the past year; and no history of orthopedic surgery.…”
Section: Data Collection and Assessment Of Physical Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The timed up and go (TUG) test and the 30 s chair-standing test (CS-30) were performed to assess the physical functions of the participants. The TUG test was performed according to previous reports [14]; the TUG test was conducted twice, and the better value of the two tests was selected as the representative. The participants were asked to sit and stand on a chair with a seat height of 40 cm, as Age-matched community-dwelling older adults were selected as healthy controls using the following inclusion criteria: age of 70 years or older; independently mobile; no chronic pain, including low back pain and lower extremities pain, at present; no visits to clinics or hospital for treatment of chronic pain within the past year; and no history of orthopedic surgery.…”
Section: Data Collection and Assessment Of Physical Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timed up and go (TUG) test and the 30 s chair-standing test (CS-30) were performed to assess the physical functions of the participants. The TUG test was performed according to previous reports [14]; the TUG test was conducted twice, and the better value of the two tests was selected as the representative. The participants were asked to sit and stand on a chair with a seat height of 40 cm, as quickly and safely as possible over 30 s periods.…”
Section: Data Collection and Assessment Of Physical Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%