2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-005-1401-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility and Early Results of Interstitial Intensity-Modulated HDR/PDR Brachytherapy (IMBT) with/without Complementary External-Beam Radiotherapy and Extended Surgery in Recurrent Pelvic Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: The combination of extended surgery and postoperative interstitial IMBT is feasible and offers effective interdisciplinary treatment of recurrent colorectal cancer. In this small and inhomogeneous cohort of patients PDR seems to be more effective than HDR, particularly when application of complementary EBRT is not possible. None of the patients who required resection of distant metastasis survived > 2 years in this study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that recurrent disease in itself is not a disqualification for multimodality treatment. This view is supported by the study of Tepel et al, who used a setup similar to ours and reported an overall five-year survival of 23% for recurrent colorectal cancer [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We believe that recurrent disease in itself is not a disqualification for multimodality treatment. This view is supported by the study of Tepel et al, who used a setup similar to ours and reported an overall five-year survival of 23% for recurrent colorectal cancer [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Several studies have shown that radical resection has a significant influence on local control [9][10][11]20,21]. However, like Nuyttens et al [17], we did not find a statistically significant impact when comparing patients with R0 and R1 resection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations