“…In this series of routinely processed samples, MAF appears similar to that reported in a previous study that used frozen brushing specimens for EGFR and KRAS testing, and was even higher in the second half‐period of the study (89%). These results are close to the reported molecular analysis from CT‐guided transthoracic sampling (TTNB), and to ultrathin bronchoscopy sampling with direct vision of the lesion . The increase in MAF in the second half‐period of the study is probably due to the higher number of biopsies performed per lesion, suggesting a clinical learning curve.…”