2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4121966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility Analysis of the Performance of Low-Cost Gnss Receivers in Monitoring Dynamic Motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
(119 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies mostly focused on geohazard monitoring such as landslide monitoring (Biagi et al 2016;Cina and Piras 2015;Heunecke et al 2011). Also, few studies tested the low-cost GNSS receivers in civil engineering-related SHM applications requiring continuous monitoring apart from Manzini et al (2022), Poluzzi et al (2019), andXue et al (2022). Therefore, we conducted an experimental study to assess the performance of the lowcost GNSS receivers in monitoring the dynamic horizontal and vertical motion of different amplitudes and frequencies against the performance of geodetic-grade GNSS receivers or the Robotic Total Station (RTS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies mostly focused on geohazard monitoring such as landslide monitoring (Biagi et al 2016;Cina and Piras 2015;Heunecke et al 2011). Also, few studies tested the low-cost GNSS receivers in civil engineering-related SHM applications requiring continuous monitoring apart from Manzini et al (2022), Poluzzi et al (2019), andXue et al (2022). Therefore, we conducted an experimental study to assess the performance of the lowcost GNSS receivers in monitoring the dynamic horizontal and vertical motion of different amplitudes and frequencies against the performance of geodetic-grade GNSS receivers or the Robotic Total Station (RTS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%