Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Impacts of Web-Based Patient Education on Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder: Quasi-Experimental Cluster Study

Abstract

BackgroundWeb-based interventions are promising tools for increasing the understanding of illness and treatment among patients with serious mental disorders.ObjectiveThis study aimed to test the feasibility and acceptability of a Web-based patient education intervention using a quasi-experimental cluster design to report feedback on patient education sessions and the website used and to report preliminary evidence of the intervention’s impact on patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder.MethodsA single-blind, parallel, quasi-experimental cluster study over a 6-month period comparing Web-based education (n=33) with a nonequivalent control group (treatment as usual, n=24) for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder was conducted. Participants (N=57) were recruited from one psychiatric hospital (6 wards). Feasibility was assessed by participants’ commitment (refusal rate, dropout rate) to the study. Acceptability was assessed as participants’ commitment to the intervention. Patient education sessions and website feedback were assessed by the patients and health care professionals. The preliminary impact of the sessions on patients’ self-efficacy, self-esteem, illness cognition, and knowledge level was measured at baseline and follow-ups (8 weeks, 6 months) with self-rated questionnaires.ResultsThe refusal rate among patients was high with no statistically significant difference (69% [74/107] in the intervention group, 76% [76/100] in the control group; P=.21). The same result was found for the dropout rates (48% [16/33] vs 58% [14/24]; P=.46). The acceptability of the intervention was good; 31 participants out of 33 (94%) completed all five sessions. Feedback on the intervention was mainly positive; three out of four subscales of session were rated above the midpoint of 4.0. Feedback on the website was also positive, with a grade of good for content (69%, 20/29 patients; 75%, 21/28 professionals), layout (62%, 18/29 patients; 61%, 17/28 professionals), and usability (62%, 18/29 patients; and 68%, 19/28 professionals). The patients using the intervention had significantly higher scores 6 months after the sessions in self-efficacy (baseline mean 26.12, SD 5.64 vs 6-month mean 29.24, SD 6.05; P=.003) and regarding knowledge level about schizophrenia (mean 11.39, SD 4.65 vs 6-month mean 15.06, SD 5.26; P=.002), and lower scores in the subscale of helplessness in illness cognition (mean 2.26, SD 0.96 vs 6-month mean 1.85, SD 0.59; P=.03). Differences from the control group were not significant. No differences were found in patients’ self-esteem or other subscales in illness cognition.ConclusionsThe patients were reluctant to participate in the study and tended to drop out before the follow-ups. Once they had participated, their acceptance of the intervention was high. A more effective recruitment strategy and monitoring method will be needed in future studies. To assess the impact of the intervention, a more rigorous study design with an adequately powered sample size will be used in cooperation with outpatient me...

Acceptability of digital health interventions: embracing the complexity

“…In addition, only one [38] out of 14 identified pilot or feasibility studies used an a priori cut-off to determine whether the intervention was considered acceptable [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. This apparent lack of cut-offs notwithstanding, 14/14 of the identified pilot or feasibility studies concluded that the intervention was moderately to highly acceptable.…”

Perception of risk of recurrence among patients with first episode and recurrent schizophrenia: A descriptive phenomenological study

“…Therefore, this study suggests that healthcare professionals should educate patients to help patients perceive their own risk of relapse [30]. They can also create a platform for support and mutual assistance for patients [31].…”

The effect of evidence‐based nursing education on nurses' clinical decision making: A randomized controlled trial

“…They concluded that evidence‐based education in nursing care is not only as effective as traditional education but promotes knowledge, skills, and quality of patient care 20 . Based on the findings of a quasi‐experimental study by Laine et al about the effect of evidence‐based patient education on schizophrenia patients' understanding of their disease, it was revealed that the use of the website in evidence‐based patient education could better improve schizophrenia patients' self‐efficacy compared with conventional methods 21 . Parker et al also showed that nursing education could shift nurses' decision‐making from intuitive to analytical.…”

“…compared with conventional methods. 21 Parker et al also showed that nursing education could shift nurses' decision-making from intuitive to analytical. They also concluded that nurses who use analytical decision-making act faster than other nurses.…”