2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fear of cycling: Social, spatial, and temporal dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with international research that shows that reasons for lower rates of cycling amongst women include: greater domestic responsibilities (Emond et al, 2009, Steinbach et al, 2011; greater vulnerability to and fear of street violence (Frater and Kingham, 2018, Ravensbergen et al, 2020, McCullough et al, 2019; being less likely to be taught cycling skills; lower levels of perceived self-efficacy with negotiating traffic (Emond et al, 2009, Félonneau et al, 2013; difficulties achieving cultural expectations of feminine dress and behavior while cycling (Emond et al, 2009, Akar et al, 2013, Frater and Kingham, 2018; and sexism, racism and exclusion within cycling cultures (Epperson, 1995, Ferguson, 2017.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These findings are consistent with international research that shows that reasons for lower rates of cycling amongst women include: greater domestic responsibilities (Emond et al, 2009, Steinbach et al, 2011; greater vulnerability to and fear of street violence (Frater and Kingham, 2018, Ravensbergen et al, 2020, McCullough et al, 2019; being less likely to be taught cycling skills; lower levels of perceived self-efficacy with negotiating traffic (Emond et al, 2009, Félonneau et al, 2013; difficulties achieving cultural expectations of feminine dress and behavior while cycling (Emond et al, 2009, Akar et al, 2013, Frater and Kingham, 2018; and sexism, racism and exclusion within cycling cultures (Epperson, 1995, Ferguson, 2017.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The findings of our interview also suggest that the level of lighting and visibility at the stations, the presence/absence of emergency help buttons at the bikes stations and the characteristics of the lanes (width, location, lighting, etc.) have significant impact on cycling, which is consistent with the subjective and objective safety findings reported in Kumar et al [36] and Ravensbergen et al [38]. • FC-Confidence/experience: Less experienced cyclists, or those with little confidence on their own cycling abilities, see the interaction with vehicles on on-road cycling infrastructure more challenging and intimidating [34].…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Segregated infrastructure, alongside interventions targeted at road culture and driver behaviour, is suggested to have stronger influence on the rate of cycling of women [35,36]. • FC-Harassment: Women are susceptible to harassment, verbal abuse and attacks in the public space and are more likely to report sexiest harassment from other road users when cycling than men [21,37,38]. Howland et al [17] found the fear of harassment by men and drivers is a significant barrier to cycling and the use of bike-sharing services by women.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender inequality often results in lower access to vehicles for women, which increases their dependence on active travel and public transport (Peters 2011). Within active travel, lack of safe environments, cultural norms, and fear of harassment discourage women from cycling (Garrard et al 2008a;Goel et al 2021;Iqbal et al 2020;Prati 2018;Ravensbergen et al 2020). Therefore, in populations with high levels of gender inequality, low vehicle ownership and poor or no infrastructure for cycling, women are particularly disadvantaged.…”
Section: Meaning Of Our Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%