Abstract:Children diagnosed with Disruptive Behavior Disorders (DBD), especially those with psychopathic traits, are at risk of developing persistent and severe antisocial behavior. Deficient fear conditioning may be a key mechanism underlying persistence, and has been associated with altered regional brain function in adult antisocial populations. In this study, we investigated the associations between the neural correlates of fear conditioning, persistence of childhood-onset DBD during adolescence and psychopathic tr… Show more
“…However, emotional hyporeactivity characterizes only one part of persistent offenders (Hodgins, 2007). Hyperreactivity during fear acquisition has been found in antisocial juveniles from lower social class (Raine and Venables, 1981) and in our previous fear acquisition study (Cohn et al, 2013). In summary, there is some evidence for aberrant fear responsiveness in subgroups of antisocial individuals, but the current literature on fear extinction in antisocial individuals is limited by an exclusive focus on the emotionally hyporeactive subgroup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…that its dimensions are distinctly associated with behavioral criterion variables (Patrick et al, 2005;Hicks and Patrick, 2006) and regional brain function (Carré et al, 2013;Cohn et al, 2013). Indeed, we found that neural responses during fear acquisition were positively associated with GM and II psychopathic traits and negatively with CU psychopathic traits (Cohn et al, 2013). However, nothing is known about the associations between the different psychopathic traits and brain activation during fear extinction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…As such, it seems relevant to investigate whether persistence of DBD in our hyperreactive sample is associated with an inability to down-regulate previously acquired fear responses in the face of changing contingencies. Importantly, our previous study (Cohn et al, 2013) also showed that group differences in neural responses during fear acquisition were largely explained by differences in psychopathic traits. In addition, various studies have shown that psychopathic traits are not a unitary construct: i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We have recently shown (Cohn et al, 2013) that neural activation during fear conditioning does not differentiate adolescents with a persistent or a desistent Disruptive Behavior Disorder [DBD; Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) or CD] compared with HCs: both DBD-persisters (DBD-p) and DBD-desisters (DBD-d) showed increased activation of the fear circuit in response to cues predicting an aversive electric unconditioned stimulus vs neutral cues. Importantly, we also found that these neural activation patterns were related to the presence of II psychopathic traits, and group differences in neural activation were in fact mediated by these II traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this report, we present extinction data from our fear conditioning experiment (Cohn et al, 2013), that is, fMRI data from a large cohort of childhood arrestees followed up in late adolescence, allowing the distinction between DBD-p, DBD-d and HCs. Because extinction studies in antisocial samples are scarce, we used a basic paradigm assessing extinction learning-relying on function of the basic fear neurocircuitry [amygdala, insula and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)]-rather than its consolidation or modulation-relying on the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, respectively (Quirk and Mueller, 2008;Delamater and Westbrook, 2014).…”
Children diagnosed with a Disruptive Behavior Disorder (DBD, i.e. Oppositional Defiant Disorder or Conduct Disorder), especially those with psychopathic traits, are at risk of developing persistent and severe antisocial behavior. Reduced fear conditioning has been proposed to underlie persistent antisocial development. However, we have recently shown that both DBD persisters and desisters are characterized by increased fear conditioning compared with healthy controls (HCs). In this study, we investigated whether brain function during fear extinction is associated with DBD subgroup-membership and psychopathic traits. Adolescents from a childhood arrestee cohort (mean age 17.6 years, s.d. 1.4) who met criteria for a DBD diagnosis during previous assessments were re-assessed and categorized as persistent DBD (n ¼ 25) or desistent DBD (n ¼ 25). Functional MRI during the extinction phase of a classical fear-conditioning task was used to compare regional brain function between these subgroups and 25 matched controls. Both DBD persisters and desisters showed hyperreactivity during fear extinction, when compared with HCs. Impulsive-irresponsible psychopathic traits were positively associated with responses in the fear neurocircuitry and mediated the association between neural activation and group membership. These results suggest that fear acquisition and fear extinction deficits may provide an endophenotype for an emotionally hyperreactive subtype of antisocial development.
“…However, emotional hyporeactivity characterizes only one part of persistent offenders (Hodgins, 2007). Hyperreactivity during fear acquisition has been found in antisocial juveniles from lower social class (Raine and Venables, 1981) and in our previous fear acquisition study (Cohn et al, 2013). In summary, there is some evidence for aberrant fear responsiveness in subgroups of antisocial individuals, but the current literature on fear extinction in antisocial individuals is limited by an exclusive focus on the emotionally hyporeactive subgroup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…that its dimensions are distinctly associated with behavioral criterion variables (Patrick et al, 2005;Hicks and Patrick, 2006) and regional brain function (Carré et al, 2013;Cohn et al, 2013). Indeed, we found that neural responses during fear acquisition were positively associated with GM and II psychopathic traits and negatively with CU psychopathic traits (Cohn et al, 2013). However, nothing is known about the associations between the different psychopathic traits and brain activation during fear extinction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…As such, it seems relevant to investigate whether persistence of DBD in our hyperreactive sample is associated with an inability to down-regulate previously acquired fear responses in the face of changing contingencies. Importantly, our previous study (Cohn et al, 2013) also showed that group differences in neural responses during fear acquisition were largely explained by differences in psychopathic traits. In addition, various studies have shown that psychopathic traits are not a unitary construct: i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We have recently shown (Cohn et al, 2013) that neural activation during fear conditioning does not differentiate adolescents with a persistent or a desistent Disruptive Behavior Disorder [DBD; Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) or CD] compared with HCs: both DBD-persisters (DBD-p) and DBD-desisters (DBD-d) showed increased activation of the fear circuit in response to cues predicting an aversive electric unconditioned stimulus vs neutral cues. Importantly, we also found that these neural activation patterns were related to the presence of II psychopathic traits, and group differences in neural activation were in fact mediated by these II traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this report, we present extinction data from our fear conditioning experiment (Cohn et al, 2013), that is, fMRI data from a large cohort of childhood arrestees followed up in late adolescence, allowing the distinction between DBD-p, DBD-d and HCs. Because extinction studies in antisocial samples are scarce, we used a basic paradigm assessing extinction learning-relying on function of the basic fear neurocircuitry [amygdala, insula and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)]-rather than its consolidation or modulation-relying on the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, respectively (Quirk and Mueller, 2008;Delamater and Westbrook, 2014).…”
Children diagnosed with a Disruptive Behavior Disorder (DBD, i.e. Oppositional Defiant Disorder or Conduct Disorder), especially those with psychopathic traits, are at risk of developing persistent and severe antisocial behavior. Reduced fear conditioning has been proposed to underlie persistent antisocial development. However, we have recently shown that both DBD persisters and desisters are characterized by increased fear conditioning compared with healthy controls (HCs). In this study, we investigated whether brain function during fear extinction is associated with DBD subgroup-membership and psychopathic traits. Adolescents from a childhood arrestee cohort (mean age 17.6 years, s.d. 1.4) who met criteria for a DBD diagnosis during previous assessments were re-assessed and categorized as persistent DBD (n ¼ 25) or desistent DBD (n ¼ 25). Functional MRI during the extinction phase of a classical fear-conditioning task was used to compare regional brain function between these subgroups and 25 matched controls. Both DBD persisters and desisters showed hyperreactivity during fear extinction, when compared with HCs. Impulsive-irresponsible psychopathic traits were positively associated with responses in the fear neurocircuitry and mediated the association between neural activation and group membership. These results suggest that fear acquisition and fear extinction deficits may provide an endophenotype for an emotionally hyperreactive subtype of antisocial development.
This chapter reviews current methods and findings of physiological research studies on persistent violence and aggression, antisocial personality disorder (ASPD), and psychopathy. The review begins by describing how ASPD and psychopathy, two clinical conditions that are commonly associated with violent and aggressive behaviors, are assessed and measured in contemporary investigative work. Following this, the chapter discusses differing physiological measurement methods that have been used in the study of these conditions and in relation to aggression and violent behavior more specifically. A detailed review of autonomic, somatic, electrocortical, and neuroimaging methods and findings is provided. Following this, the chapter provides coverage of key conceptual issues pertaining to the use of physiological measurement in assessing psychiatric phenotypes and psychological processes central to them. Directions for future research are discussed in this context.
Verbal and physical aggression begin early in life and steadily decline thereafter in normal development. As a result, elevated aggressive behavior in adolescence may signal atypical development and greater vulnerability for negative mental and health outcomes. Converging evidence suggests that brain disturbances in regions involved in impulse control, emotional regulation, and sensation seeking may contribute to heightened aggression. However, little is known regarding the neural mechanisms underlying subtypes of aggression (i.e., proactive and reactive aggression) and whether they differ between males and females. Using a sample of 106 14-year-old adolescent twins, this study found that striatal enlargement was associated with both proactive and reactive aggression. We also found that volumetric alterations in several frontal regions including smaller middle frontal and larger orbitofrontal cortex were correlated with higher levels of aggression in adolescent twins. In addition, cortical thickness analysis showed that thickness alterations in many overlapping regions including middle frontal, superior frontal, and anterior cingulate cortex and temporal regions were associated with aggression in adolescent twins. Results support the involvement of fronto-limbic-striatal circuit in the etiology of aggression during adolescence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.