Fear and Loathing or Strategic Priming? Unveiling the Audience in Duterte's Crime Rhetoric

Abstract

This paper examines speechmaking on a contentious policy by arguably one of the most controversial figures to have assumed the Philippine presidency. Drawing on quantitative textual approaches on a corpus of 845 presidential speeches delivered between June 2016 and July 2020, we provide evidence that Rodrigo Duterte's evocative utterances against drug lords and criminals are not just deliberate illocutionary acts intended to court public support, but also priming tactics aimed towards a politically and economically significant audience whose acquiescence gives symbolic legitimacy to a controversial anti-crime policy. Using quantitative textual approaches and econometric analysis, we find that violent-crime rhetoric is more likely to accompany public pronouncements made before a political audience consisting of law enforcement authorities and government officials, as well as an economic audience made up of business chambers, overseas Filipino workers, and labor groups. Overall, the findings nuance an image of Duterte beyond that of a penal populist.

Junctures in the time of COVID-19: Topic search and government's framing of COVID-19 response in the Philippines

“…However, as is typical in studies of this type, our interest is precisely to read the government's policy position from a corpus consisting of its own statements. This is consistent with studies that analyze political texts from unilateral sources such as party manifestos ( Eder et al, 2017 ), party elite interviews ( Ecker et al, 2022 ), and public pronouncements or speeches by key political actors such as chief executives ( Kaufman, 2020 ; Panao and Pernia, 2022 ).…”

Attempt at Dissecting Duterte’s Presidency Using the Political Ideas of Plato, Hobbes, Locke, and Machiavelli

“…If you fight back, then you will die [16]. To threaten or inflict fear on the people in the state of killing them is the easiest route for the people to go back to their chaotic state of being [48]. Moreover, Hobbes argues that the Leviathan can, stifle the economy, propose questionable taxes, and imprison people for the sake of his pleasure.…”