2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2021.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fear and hoping in the Arctic: Charting the emotional fabric of resource extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This 'dominant techno-scientific governmentality' (Dale 2016) of resource management and related cultures of argumentation constitute a 'truth' about resources, what should be done with them and why that leaves very little room for non-expert voices to participate in the processes of its definition -equally within the formal frameworks of public participation and in broader societal debates (also Strauss 2011;Desbiens 2013). Paradoxically, this remains the case even when those societal resource-debates deemed as 'objective' or 'rational' have been established as thoroughly penetrated by affective states and statements (see Weszkalnys 2016; Lempinen & Lindroth 2021;Sejersen & Thisted 2021;Kangasluoma & Lempinen 2022). The way in which Finnish water governance has been geared towards allocating the maximum amount of water for hydropower production (Albrecht et al 2023) is not any less dependent from hopes, fears and wants of different actors involved than resistance of hydropower is.…”
Section: Sustainability Depoliticizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This 'dominant techno-scientific governmentality' (Dale 2016) of resource management and related cultures of argumentation constitute a 'truth' about resources, what should be done with them and why that leaves very little room for non-expert voices to participate in the processes of its definition -equally within the formal frameworks of public participation and in broader societal debates (also Strauss 2011;Desbiens 2013). Paradoxically, this remains the case even when those societal resource-debates deemed as 'objective' or 'rational' have been established as thoroughly penetrated by affective states and statements (see Weszkalnys 2016; Lempinen & Lindroth 2021;Sejersen & Thisted 2021;Kangasluoma & Lempinen 2022). The way in which Finnish water governance has been geared towards allocating the maximum amount of water for hydropower production (Albrecht et al 2023) is not any less dependent from hopes, fears and wants of different actors involved than resistance of hydropower is.…”
Section: Sustainability Depoliticizedmentioning
confidence: 99%