2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2016.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fe3+ in pottery: Distinction of the use for cooking and production parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pottery can be considered of particular interest by their relative abundance compared to other finds types in archaeological sites. Its manufacturing is influenced by several factors, namely, temperature, duration, and reducing/oxidizing conditions of firing [8][9][10], defining a technological fingerprint for each production [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pottery can be considered of particular interest by their relative abundance compared to other finds types in archaeological sites. Its manufacturing is influenced by several factors, namely, temperature, duration, and reducing/oxidizing conditions of firing [8][9][10], defining a technological fingerprint for each production [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pottery characterization is made from optical and electron microscopies, elemental analysis, thermal analysis, X‐ray diffraction, infrared and Raman spectroscopies, among other techniques, yielding the essential information on the provenance and technology of the archaeological samples . One frequent problem in field archaeology is the discrimination between different types of pottery when it is recovered from the site in fragmented state and/or when there is no well‐defined stratigraphy and/or when productions from different provenances are accumulated in the same site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na arqueologia brasileira, vários autores realizaram trabalhos importantes e influentes de arqueometria em material cerâmico como: Appoloni et al 1997;Appoloni, 2015;Mangueira et al 2016;Silva et al 2005; Hartmann et al 2007;Faria et al 2002;Melquiades et al 2010;Rizzutto et al 2007;Goulart, 2004;Costa et al 1991;Coelho et al 1996;Costa & Kern, 1999;Kern & Costa, 2001;Costa et al 2002;Costa et al 2006Costa et al , 2009Kern et al 2009;Scorzelli et al 1999;Scorzelli 2001;Alves, 1988Alves, , 1997Alves & Girardi, 1989;Middleton, 1997;Goulart et al 2006;Figueiredo, 2008;Milheira et al 2009;Magalhães, 2015;Bastos, 2016.…”
Section: Dobresunclassified