2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2004.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fe isotopic fractionation during mineral dissolution with and without bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
179
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(97 reference statements)
6
179
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With the assumption that the DFe sink at both depths (intermediate and deep) is dominated by the same scavenging process (2,39,40), then our observations suggest that the processes dominating the DFe sources in the deep ocean layers are not organic matter remineralization given the heavier DFe isotopic signatures uncovered. At depth, non-reductive release of DFe from particles (3,10,11,17) could produce the observed isotopically heavier DFe, potentially through the following: (i) desorption as suggested for thorium and protactinium (5), rare earth elements (6) or copper (7), or (ii) ligand (siderophore)-promoted dissolution (42). This hypothesis is supported by the recent documentation of the isotopic signature of a labile fraction of suspended particles (from the North Atlantic), for which typical values are found around −0.3‰ (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the assumption that the DFe sink at both depths (intermediate and deep) is dominated by the same scavenging process (2,39,40), then our observations suggest that the processes dominating the DFe sources in the deep ocean layers are not organic matter remineralization given the heavier DFe isotopic signatures uncovered. At depth, non-reductive release of DFe from particles (3,10,11,17) could produce the observed isotopically heavier DFe, potentially through the following: (i) desorption as suggested for thorium and protactinium (5), rare earth elements (6) or copper (7), or (ii) ligand (siderophore)-promoted dissolution (42). This hypothesis is supported by the recent documentation of the isotopic signature of a labile fraction of suspended particles (from the North Atlantic), for which typical values are found around −0.3‰ (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental data on aqueous Fe species, Fe-oxides and Fe-carbonates have been documented and demonstrate that the largest Fe isotope fractionations are produced during redox reactions in both biologically mediated (Brantley et al, 2001Anbar, 2004;Johnson et al, 2004;Beard et al, 1999Beard et al, ,2003Icopini et al, 2004;Croal et al, 2004) and abiotic systems (Anbar et al, 2000;Skulan et al, 2002Brantley et al, 2004Welch et al, 2003;Matthews et al, 2004;Teutsch et al, 2005;Jang et al, 2008, Handler et al, 2009McAnena, 2009, Beard et al, 2010. Smaller, but significant fractionations have been seen in abiotic non-redox reactions (Wiesli et al, 2004;Wiedehold et al, 2006;Dideriksen et al, 2008;Mikutta et al, 2009), including the ligand-exchange process involved in mackinawite (FeS m ) formation (Butler et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iron is an abundant element in nature; however, in most aqueous aerobic environments iron forms insoluble ferric hydroxide, Fe(OH) 3 . This poses a major problem for most aerobic bacteria, as ferric hydroxide has a solubility constant of 10 Ϫ39 M, therefore limiting the concentration of ferric ions to 10 Ϫ18 M at pH 7.0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%