2010
DOI: 10.1080/01490450903456749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fe(III) Reduction in the Subsurface at a Low-level Radioactive Waste Disposal Site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rapid expansion of an emerging nuclear industry immediately following World War II resulted in substantial volumes of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) being generated from nuclear fuel cycle, weapons production, medical radioisotope, and radiochemical research activities. Although there was no consensus at this time, low-level waste (and in some cases more-active material) was commonly disposed of by burial in shallow trenches, as evidenced in the United States at Maxey Flats ( 1 ), Oak Ridge ( 2 ), and Hanford ( 3 , 4 ), in Canada at Chalk River ( 5 ), in the United Kingdom at Harwell ( 6 ) and at an LLRW disposal site ( 7 ), in Lithuania at Maišiagala ( 8 ), and more recently in Ukraine at Chernobyl ( 9 ), to name but a few. This was also the case for Australia's only nuclear (research) reactor at Lucas Heights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid expansion of an emerging nuclear industry immediately following World War II resulted in substantial volumes of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) being generated from nuclear fuel cycle, weapons production, medical radioisotope, and radiochemical research activities. Although there was no consensus at this time, low-level waste (and in some cases more-active material) was commonly disposed of by burial in shallow trenches, as evidenced in the United States at Maxey Flats ( 1 ), Oak Ridge ( 2 ), and Hanford ( 3 , 4 ), in Canada at Chalk River ( 5 ), in the United Kingdom at Harwell ( 6 ) and at an LLRW disposal site ( 7 ), in Lithuania at Maišiagala ( 8 ), and more recently in Ukraine at Chernobyl ( 9 ), to name but a few. This was also the case for Australia's only nuclear (research) reactor at Lucas Heights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, numerous sediment microcosm studies indicate that microbially-mediated metal and radionuclide reduction do not commence until nitrate and nitrite are completely reduced (e.g. Burke et al 2005;Edwards et al 2007;McBeth et al 2007;Li and Krumholz 2008;Wilkins et al 2010). Further, some biostimulation studies with low pH sediments have demonstrated that the pathways and extent of nitrate removal are strongly pH dependant, with artificial NaHCO 3 or crushed lime amendment necessary to stimulate bioreduction and TEAP progression (North et al 2004;Edwards et al 2007;Michalsen et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid expansion of an emerging nuclear industry immediately following World War II resulted in substantial volumes of low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) being generated from nuclear fuel cycle, weapons production, medical radioisotope and radiochemical research activities. Although there was no consensus at this time, low-level waste (and in some cases more active material) was commonly disposed of by burial in shallow trenches, as evidenced in the United States at Maxey Flats (1), Oak Ridge (2) and Hanford (3, 4); Canada at Chalk River (5); in the United Kingdom at Harwell (6) and LLRW (7); in Lithuania at Maišiagala (8); and more recently in Ukraine at Chernobyl (9) to name but a few. This was also the case for Australia’s only nuclear (research) reactor at Lucas Heights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%