1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7952(99)00057-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fe(II)–Na ion exchange at interlayers of smectite: adsorption–desorption experiments and a natural analogue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has two reactive surfaces: the siloxane basal planes, and the edges 7 with mixed aluminol and silanol groups. Fe 2+ sorbs to these siloxane planes by cation exchange KAMEI et al, 1999). It also sorbs to the edges via a complex pH-dependent surface complexation mechanism (Géhin et al, 2007).…”
Section: The Reactive Fe(ii)-clay Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has two reactive surfaces: the siloxane basal planes, and the edges 7 with mixed aluminol and silanol groups. Fe 2+ sorbs to these siloxane planes by cation exchange KAMEI et al, 1999). It also sorbs to the edges via a complex pH-dependent surface complexation mechanism (Géhin et al, 2007).…”
Section: The Reactive Fe(ii)-clay Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most probable reaction would be the conversion of exchangeable cations of montmorillonite from Na þ to Fe 2þ ions (i.e., conversion of Namontmorillonite to Fe(II)-montmorillonite) since a deepunderground repository is under a reducing condition. 4,5) Carlson et al 6) reported higher hydraulic conductivity for altered bentonite samples that were obtained by contacting solution-saturated bentonite with carbon steel wire at 30 and 50 C for 829 and 911 d, respectively, and cast iron coupons at 30 and 50 C for 900 and 356 d, respectively. Although they suggested ion exchange reaction of Fe 2þ ions with Na þ ions in the montmorillonite interlayer, the extent of the reaction and its effects on the hydraulic conductivity had not been clarified in their study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experiments were designed to produce extreme conditions to favour smectite alteration with high Fe 2+ activities rather than to simulate repository conditions. It has also been suggested that dissolved Fe may replace Na + from smectite layers (Kamei et al, 1999). In experiments 2-1, 2-2, and 2-3, the Fe 2+ concentration was approximately twice that required to saturate the interlayers, whereas in experiments 4-6, the concentration was sufficient to replace only half of the interlayer sorption sites.…”
Section: Experimental Parametersmentioning
confidence: 96%