2008
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m804345200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FE(II) Is the Native Cofactor for Escherichia coli Methionine Aminopeptidase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(78 reference statements)
1
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the study of metalloenzymes in vitro has a long history, there are now several examples where the cofactor required for in vivo function was initially misassigned (Jain et al, 2005, Chai et al, 2008). This reflects the fact that metalloenzymes are often assayed under conditions that may not mimic the levels of metal ion availability in the cell.…”
Section: Microbial Adaptation and Acclimation To Metal Ion Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the study of metalloenzymes in vitro has a long history, there are now several examples where the cofactor required for in vivo function was initially misassigned (Jain et al, 2005, Chai et al, 2008). This reflects the fact that metalloenzymes are often assayed under conditions that may not mimic the levels of metal ion availability in the cell.…”
Section: Microbial Adaptation and Acclimation To Metal Ion Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there are some proteins whose natural metal ion was assigned as Co II in pioneering studies, and taken as such in Kobayashi and Shimizu's review, but was later on proven to be a different one. For example, Fe II , but not Co II , is the native metal ion in methionine aminopeptidase (Chai et al, 2008;Sule et al, 2012) and Mn II , but not Co II , is the native ion in prolidase (Besio et al, 2013). In other proteins, the native requirement for Co II is not clear because similar variants and isoforms seem to employ different ions; for example, some xylose isomerases require one of either Co II or Mg II for maximal stability and activity (Epting et al, 2005), whereas at least one isoform of glucose isomerase requires the presence of both ions in the medium to achieve maximum activity (Wang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, conversion of ( 17 ) to hydroxamic acid derivative ( 21 ) results in dramatic activity increases when screened against these cofactors ( Ec MetAP IC 50 for ( 17 ) = >200, 94 and 2.9 μM; Co(II), Fe (II), Mn(II) cofactors, respectively; Ec MetAP IC 50 for ( 21 ) = 3.5, 1, 1.3 μM; Co(II), Fe (II), Mn(II) cofactors, respectively) [41]. Additionally, ( 21 ) was crystallized with Ec MetAP1 bearing Mn(II) cofactors (PDB: 4A6W); the crystal structure demonstrates bridging interactions to both active site metals as opposed to chelation demonstrated for the crystal structure of ( 17 ) (Fig.…”
Section: Classes Of Metap Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, other 5-aryl-2-heterocyclic carboxylic acids (i.e. oxazole, 1,2,4-oxadiazole, 1,3,4-oxadiazole, and imidazole) were screened against Ec MetAP1 and were found to exhibit comparable or worse inhibitory activity [41]. …”
Section: Classes Of Metap Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%