2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.119897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fe and P Doped 1T-Phase Enriched WS23D-Dendritic Nanostructures for Efficient Overall Water Splitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the P 2p spectrum, the peaks at 129.7 and 130.3 eV were ascribed to P 2p 3/2 and P 2p 1/2 . Compared with the Ni 3 P-Ni/CNTs, the binding energy of P 2p for N-Ni 3 P-Ni/N-CNTs shifted to the negative binding energy, attributing to the variation of electron density around surface P sites. Besides, the peak intensity of P–O in N-Ni 3 P-Ni/N-CNTs was significantly lower than the peak intensity of P–O in Ni 3 P-Ni/CNTs. In this network structure (N-Ni 3 P-Ni/N-CNTs), these nanoparticles were preserved in carbon shells of bamboo-like N-CNTs, which could avoid the direct contact of nanoparticles with oxygen, so that the catalyst had a rather high stability. , The total N content was observed at about 11.76 atom % in the N-Ni 3 P-Ni/N-CNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the P 2p spectrum, the peaks at 129.7 and 130.3 eV were ascribed to P 2p 3/2 and P 2p 1/2 . Compared with the Ni 3 P-Ni/CNTs, the binding energy of P 2p for N-Ni 3 P-Ni/N-CNTs shifted to the negative binding energy, attributing to the variation of electron density around surface P sites. Besides, the peak intensity of P–O in N-Ni 3 P-Ni/N-CNTs was significantly lower than the peak intensity of P–O in Ni 3 P-Ni/CNTs. In this network structure (N-Ni 3 P-Ni/N-CNTs), these nanoparticles were preserved in carbon shells of bamboo-like N-CNTs, which could avoid the direct contact of nanoparticles with oxygen, so that the catalyst had a rather high stability. , The total N content was observed at about 11.76 atom % in the N-Ni 3 P-Ni/N-CNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…When Fe was introduced, EIS results (Figure 4d) reveal that the charge transfer resistances of V-FeNi 3 N/Ni 3 N (3.5 Ω) and FeNi 3 N/Ni 3 N (9.5 Ω) are less than those of V-Ni 3 N (33.1 Ω), and Ni 3 N (60.1 Ω), revealing that Fe-doping could enhance the electrical conductivities of V-FeNi 3 N/Ni 3 N and FeNi 3 N/Ni 3 N at the electrode/electrolyte interface. 76 The C dl value of V-FeNi 3 N/Ni 3 N is 11.8 mF cm −2 and larger than that of FeNi 3 N/Ni 3 N (7.7 mF cm −2 ) (Figure S13), implying that V-FeNi 3 N/Ni 3 N has a larger active surface area and could provide more active sites than FeNi 3 N/ Ni 3 N for the OER. 77 Besides, the durability of V-FeNi 3 N/ Ni 3 N was measured by a multi-step current density approach, from 10 to 20, 50, and 100 and then back to 50 and 10 mA cm −2 with 10 h running at each step.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A smaller Tafel slope confirms that V-FeNi 3 N/Ni 3 N has a more rapid OER kinetic process. When Fe was introduced, EIS results (Figure d) reveal that the charge transfer resistances of V-FeNi 3 N/Ni 3 N (3.5 Ω) and FeNi 3 N/Ni 3 N (9.5 Ω) are less than those of V-Ni 3 N (33.1 Ω), and Ni 3 N (60.1 Ω), revealing that Fe-doping could enhance the electrical conductivities of V-FeNi 3 N/Ni 3 N and FeNi 3 N/Ni 3 N at the electrode/electrolyte interface . The C dl value of V-FeNi 3 N/Ni 3 N is 11.8 mF cm –2 and larger than that of FeNi 3 N/Ni 3 N (7.7 mF cm –2 ) (Figure S13), implying that V-FeNi 3 N/Ni 3 N has a larger active surface area and could provide more active sites than FeNi 3 N/Ni 3 N for the OER .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] The OER performance is heavily influenced by water-adsorption capability and the electrical conductivity of the catalysts, which are strongly correlated to their electronic configurations, especially the electron delocalization. [12][13][14] In this regard, defect engineering has been adopted as a potential approach to cause electron delocalization. [13] Currently, as one of the most studied types of defect engineering, oxygen vacancy creations in transition metal oxides can facilitate electrochemical water splitting by activating the neighboring atoms, causing the antibonding orbitals to shift upward toward the Fermi level, thereby providing extra electronic states around the Fermi level and increasing the reactivity of the catalytically active sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%