2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FDG uptake heterogeneity evaluated by fractal analysis improves the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
43
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, more recently the heterogeneity of 18 F-FDG uptake within tumors has been associated with treatment failure (4,(6)(7)(8). Proposed approaches to assessing the heterogeneity of intratumoral activity distribution include visual evaluation (9), SUV coefficient of variation (10), area under the curve of the cumulative histogram (11), and fractal (12) or textural feature analysis (10,13). The last of these can provide several parameters quantifying tumor heterogeneity on a scale of voxels or groups of voxels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, more recently the heterogeneity of 18 F-FDG uptake within tumors has been associated with treatment failure (4,(6)(7)(8). Proposed approaches to assessing the heterogeneity of intratumoral activity distribution include visual evaluation (9), SUV coefficient of variation (10), area under the curve of the cumulative histogram (11), and fractal (12) or textural feature analysis (10,13). The last of these can provide several parameters quantifying tumor heterogeneity on a scale of voxels or groups of voxels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), la forme et l'hétérogénéité, a contrario, peuvent être mesurées, quantifiées et caractérisées à l'aide d'un très grand nombre de paramètres et de méthodes (Section 3). Le faible nombre de travaux de standardisation ou d'études comparatives permettant d'identifier les paramètres les plus fiables, pose alors problème et constitue un facteur limitant pour l'adoption de ces nouveaux indices, malgré leur popularité croissante dans la communauté scientifique et clinique, comme le suggère le nombre étonnant de revues et éditoriaux déjà publiés sur le sujet en quelques années seulement [8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Nouveaux Indices : Obstacles à Surmonterunclassified
“…The fractal dimension (FD) is a quantitative metric obtained as a slope of the logarithmical function between the number of voxels with a SUV higher than the threshold and a threshold of a percent of the maximum SUV. Although these methods have been reported to be useful for the evaluation of malignant tumors in the clinical setting [6,7], it has been suggested that factors such as partial volume effect (PVE) and image noise may influence the results [7]. In lung cancer, respiratory motion causes the deterioration of image quality and reduces FDG uptake due to image blurring [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recently, heterogeneity in the intratumoral uptake of FDG has received focus as a new metric of evaluating malignant tumors [5]. Heterogeneity in the intratumoral uptake of FDG has been reported to be useful for the differential diagnosis between malignant and benign lung tumors and for evaluating the treatment response in lung cancer [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation