FDG PET using SUVmax for preoperative T-staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Abstract

BackgroundAccurate T-staging is pivotal for predicting prognosis and selecting appropriate therapies for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The diagnostic performance of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for its T-staging is uncertain. We investigated use of FDG PET/CT for preoperative T-staging of patients with ESCC.MethodsPatients with ESCC given preoperative FDG PET/CT scans, either with (CRT[+] group) or without (CRT[−] group) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, were retrospectively reviewed. Maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumors on FDG PET/CT scans were measured, and histopathological results were used as the reference standard. The associations between pathological T-stage and potential factors of age, tumor location, tumor grade, tumor size, and tumor SUVmax were analyzed. The cut-off levels of SUVmax for predicting different T-stages and for residual viable tumors after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were determined using receiver operating characteristic analyses.ResultsWe enrolled 103 patients (45 in the CRT[−] group; 58 in the CRT[+] group). SUVmax, an independent predictive factor, positively correlated with the pathological T-stage in both groups (CRT[−] group: ρ = 0.736, p < 0.001; and CRT[+] group: ρ = 0.792, p < 0.001). The overall accuracy of the PET/CT with thresholded SUVmax for predicting the pathological T-stage was 73.3% in the CRT[−] group (SUVmax of T0: 0–1.9, T1: 2.0–4.4, T2: 4.5–6.5, T3: 6.6–13.0, T4: >13.0) and 67.2% in the CRT[+] group (SUVmax of T0: 0–3.4, T1: 3.5–3.9, T2: 4.0–5.5, T3: 5.6–6.2, T4: > 6.2). For CRT[−] group, the accuracy using an SUVmax cut-off of 4.4 to differentiate early (T0-1) from locally advanced disease (T2-4) was 82.2% (95% CI, 71.1–93.4%). For CRT[+] group, the accuracy using an SUVmax cut-off of 3.4 to predict residual viable tumors (non-T0) after completion of chemoradiotherapy was 82.8% (95% CI, 73.0–92.5%).ConclusionsThe FDG avidity of a primary esophageal tumor significantly positively correlated with the pathological T-stage. PET/CT with thresholded SUVmax was useful for predicting T-stage and differentiating residual viable tumors.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12880-016-0171-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy

“…Among the parameters tested for classification in our study, Entropy was ranked the most important by the algorithm. Entropy and Entropy-related features, which express disorder and heterogeneity of the image and -by extension- are hypothesized to mirror tumoral heterogeneity itself, have been demonstrated in (meta-)analyses of several different tumor entities and across imaging modalities as reliable and repeatable quantitative parameters [24–26].…”

The Clinical Outcomes of Locally Advanced Cervical Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Receiving Curative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

“…With respect to lymph nodes, reduction in the short axis of lymph nodes to <10 mm on chest CT and EUS was documented. In addition, there was no increased uptake of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose in PET scans with maximum standardized uptake values of >3.4 and >4.1 for primary esophageal tumor and lymph nodes, respectively [31,32].…”

Assessment of final-year medical students’ performance in diagnosing critical findings on chest X-ray

“…A small study ( n = 22) that was done on junior doctors to identify general pathologies on chest X-ray found a low overall accuracy and confidence (51 and 57.5%, respectively) (14). Another small study from Iran showed a low accuracy that reached only 8% for ARDS and 15% for normal chest X-ray among practitioners, pointing to the need for improving their emergency radiology curricula [ 9 ]. A recent study that included radiology residents showed that they generally have around 90.4 and 79.6% accuracy in identifying abnormal and normal chest X-rays, respectively, but only 52.7% in reaching the exact diagnosis, where they were tested on imagings of both life-threatening and non-life-threatening conditions [ 8 ].…”