2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04815-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FDG PET/CT for tumoral and systemic immune response monitoring of advanced melanoma during first-line combination ipilimumab and nivolumab treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of volumetric parameters in FDG-PET/CT as a predictive biomarker has been demonstrated in different types of cancers [5,[13][14][15][16][17]. The total metabolic tumor volume is a valuable parameter as it reflects the extent and activity of the tumor [18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of volumetric parameters in FDG-PET/CT as a predictive biomarker has been demonstrated in different types of cancers [5,[13][14][15][16][17]. The total metabolic tumor volume is a valuable parameter as it reflects the extent and activity of the tumor [18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hitherto, a non-negligible number of studies have evaluated the efficacy of PET/CT in predicting treatment response of metastatic melanoma patients to ICIs. While most papers have focused on later time points during the course or after the end of treatment [26,28,[30][31][32]40], few of them also reported on application of the imaging modality early during immunotherapy. Our group previously showed in a cohort of 22 patients that PET/CT performed after two ipilimumab cycles-and after application of the EORTC criteria-correctly predicted treatment response after completion of the 4-cycle treatment in the majority (87%) of PMD patients and in all SMD patients [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, patterns of [ 18 F]FDG uptake on interim PET/CT suggestive of radiologic manifestations of irAEs to immunotherapy were documented. Based on our experience and the published literature in the field [ 29 , 32 ], we defined radiologic irAEs as sites of newly emerging, increased compared to baseline imaging, non-malignant [ 18 F]FDG accumulation in organs known to exhibit immune-related signs on PET/CT. In particular, a new, diffusely enhanced tracer uptake in organs such as the gastrointestinal tract (mostly colon), the thyroid gland and the bone marrow, or, respectively, a new, relatively symmetrical, increased uptake in lymph nodes (e.g., mediastinal/hilar, inguinal) and in joints following ICIs were considered suggestive of radiologic irAEs in these organs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, despite the more effective way of assessing the [ 18 F]FDG PET-based response in patients treated with ICPIs, available studies suggest that [ 18 F]FDG PET can support decision-making about the continuation/discontinuation of therapy, as it can open several windows able to capture different aspects associated with the effect of treatment (i.e., pseudoprogression, hyperprogression, and IRAE) [56]. Table 2 reports the characteristics of published studies involving the use of [ 18 F]FDG PET to assess the response to ICI [46][47][48]50,51,54,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. Figure 2 shows a representative example of baseline and post-treatment [ 18 F]FDG PET in a patient with advanced NSCLC treated with Nivolumab.…”
Section: Pet-based Response To Icpis In Patients With Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 99%