2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FDG-PET and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Presently, we are unable to accurately characterise the radiological changes seen following SBRT [3], particularly at the site of treatment where marked inflammatory and fibrotic changes may resemble or obscure signs of recurrent disease [7]. Although a healthy level of clinical suspicion for recurrence should be maintained, false positives are possible (as in patient D) and the potential morbidity of unnecessary major surgery should be kept in mind.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, we are unable to accurately characterise the radiological changes seen following SBRT [3], particularly at the site of treatment where marked inflammatory and fibrotic changes may resemble or obscure signs of recurrent disease [7]. Although a healthy level of clinical suspicion for recurrence should be maintained, false positives are possible (as in patient D) and the potential morbidity of unnecessary major surgery should be kept in mind.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appearance of a zone of consolidation on chest computed tomography (CT) could be radiation pneumonitis, radiation fibrosis, persisting tumor growth or local recurrence (25). Tumor serum markers as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomographic (FDG-PET) images may be helpful in the differential diagnosis although increased FDG-uptake may persist up to 2 years after SRT without evidence of recurrence (26,27).…”
Section: Salvage Surgery In Early-stage Lung Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential challenge after either SABR or immunotherapy when given as single agent therapies is progressive disease as defined by RECIST criteria which is in fact pseudo-progression and appears indicative of immune effector cell infiltration into the tumour prior to eventual tumour response [47]. Pseudo-progression following SABR in the treatment of stage 1 lung cancer may be observed for up to 1 year after treatment, even when PET/CT is used to reassess the treated area and low grade FDG uptake may remain and increase in intensity for up to 1 year after treatment [48]. In a recent study of Pembrolizumab as monotherapy in the treatment of melanoma, RECIST 1.1 under-estimated the clinical response rates in up to 15% of patients [49][50].…”
Section: Challenges In Assessing Responsementioning
confidence: 99%