“…At the end of this part, visual comparison results will be presented. The performance of our EARMNet is tested with several state-of-art works in this part on the Cityscapes datasets: SegNet [6], Enet [18], SQNet [28], ESPNet [19], CGNet [38], ContextNet [39], EDANet [40], Fast-SCNN [42], Fast-SCNN [42], BiseNet [1], ICNet [43], DABNet [36], LEDNet [10], FBSNet [2], DFANet [44], FDDWNet [45] and MSCFNet [21]. We can learn from Table 5 and Table 6, the comparison results show that our EARMNet achieves a good balance between prediction accuracy and efficiency.…”