2008
DOI: 10.1086/588680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FCAPTuvbyPhotometry of the mCP Stars HR 1297, 25 Sex, BX Boo, and 49 Her

Abstract: ABSTRACT. I obtained additional differential Strömgren uvby observations of four magnetic CP stars HR 1297, 25 Sex, BX Boo, and 49 Her with the Four College Automated Photoelectric Telescope (FCAPT). The seasonal light curves of 25 Sex do not show definite differences. The period of Manfroid & Renson of 4.37900 days is confirmed. The other three stars usually have light curves in phase or nearly so, but there are differences between observing seasons. As the local properties of the photosphere change very slow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For HD 26571, Catalano & Renson (1998) gave a period of 1.06 d, while Renson & Catalano (2001) gave a period of 15.749 d. Our periodogram did not show any significant peak around the 1‐d period; therefore, we presume that the 15.749‐d period, given by Renson & Catalano (2001), is the correct one. Adelman (2008) confirmed the longer period and refined it to 15.7505 d. For HD 134214, Catalano & Renson (1998) gave a period of 248 d, while Renson & Catalano (2001) gave a period of 4.15 d. Our periodogram did not present any significant peak around 4 d, meaning that the longer period is more likely to be the correct one.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For HD 26571, Catalano & Renson (1998) gave a period of 1.06 d, while Renson & Catalano (2001) gave a period of 15.749 d. Our periodogram did not show any significant peak around the 1‐d period; therefore, we presume that the 15.749‐d period, given by Renson & Catalano (2001), is the correct one. Adelman (2008) confirmed the longer period and refined it to 15.7505 d. For HD 134214, Catalano & Renson (1998) gave a period of 248 d, while Renson & Catalano (2001) gave a period of 4.15 d. Our periodogram did not present any significant peak around 4 d, meaning that the longer period is more likely to be the correct one.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Our periodogram did not show any significant peak around the 1 day period, therefore we presume that the 15.749 days period, given by Renson & Catalano (2001) is the correct one. Adelman (2008) confirmed the longer period and refined it to 15.7505 days. For HD 134214, Catalano & Renson (1998) gave a period of 248 days, while Renson & Catalano (2001) gave a period of 4.15 days.…”
Section: Notes On Individual Starsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This star is confirmed as a slow rotator with P rot = 15.7505 ± 0.0004 d via ground-based photometry (Adelman 2008) and has a projected surface rotational velocity of v sin i = 20.0 ± 3.0 km s −1 (Wraight et al 2012). However, the rotation period of HD 26571 is somewhat disputed in the literature, where a value of 1.06 d was given by Catalano & Renson (1998), although these authors commented that this value is dubious and could arise from a 1-day alias, and Wraight et al (2012) classifying the star as non-variable.…”
Section: Epic 210964459 -Hd 26571mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…HD 133029: The 2.8804(3) d TESS period provides a poor phasing of the Bz measurements. The period from Adelman (2008) is similar (2.88756 d), but more precise, and while it does phase the individual Bz datasets this period does not phase the combined DAO and Borra & Landstreet (1980) magnetic datasets. The nearest period which approximately phases Bz is 2.88767(6) d, which also gives a coherent phasing of the TESS and Hipparcos photometry, although this does not result in a perfect match in Bz (see Fig.…”
Section: Starmentioning
confidence: 81%