Favourable social innovation ecosystem(s)? – An explorative approach

Terstriep, Judith; Rehfeld, Dieter; Kleverbeck, Maria

doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1708868

Cited by 69 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 101 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As co-creation involves new social practices and new modes of interaction, it can be considered as an emerging and currently diffusing social innovation itself. Furthermore, Terstriep et al, (2020) emphasized that processes of social innovation are often determined by co-creation, because cross-sectoral cooperation and the participation of all actors involved are a success factor for its emergence and fruitful development (cf. Carayannis and Campbell, 2009 ).…”

Section: Ecosystems Of Co-creation As An Empirical Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although there is a gap in the literature with a unified perspective ( Terstriep et al, 2020 ), more recently, some efforts have been made to understand the social, cultural, and institutional aspects of an ecosystem. For example, earlier research shows a focus on the business ecosystem ( Anggraeni et al, 2007 ; Williamson and De Meyer, 2012 ; Spigel, 2017 ), while other studies explore innovation ecosystems ( Adner, 2006 ; Adner, 2012 ) and more recently social innovation ecosystems ( Kaletka et al, 2017 ; Pel et al, 2020 ; Terstriep et al, 2020 ). Authors such as De Vasconcelos Gomes et al, (2018) recognize that there is a transition in the theoretical perspectives of business ecosystems to innovation ecosystem.…”

Section: Ecosystems Of Co-creation As An Empirical Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, this perspective may raise concerns about the strong diversity of rules, norms, and practices, as recognizes that comparison are difficult ( Edquist, 2011 , 37). Scholars such as Terstriep et al, (2020) applied a regional perspective to social innovation ecosystems, including actors, institutions, knowledge, and innovation pathways as main elements of analysis. This perspective has the advantage of showing multilayers that define each process of the innovation.…”

Section: Ecosystems Of Co-creation As An Empirical Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Ecosystems of Co-Creation

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Citizen science is becoming increasingly important as a new and participative mode of knowledge production. An essential element of citizen science is co-creation. Co-creation is by no means limited to a modus operandi for participatory science, but introduces a form of collaborative way of working with society in the sense of citizen science. Results from the H2020 SISCODE project show that co-creation is located inside and between different sectors of society. This article focuses on the question of how co-creation can be better understood in different contexts, and presents a heuristic model that has already been used for case study analyses in the SISCODE project. After an introduction to the field of co-creation and a brief description of the heuristic model, its capability is exemplarily demonstrated via application to two selected cases, followed by a discussion of central learnings and implications for further research on co-creation.

show abstract

Section: Ecosystems Of Co-creation As An Empirical Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Ecosystems Of Co-creation As An Empirical Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Ecosystems Of Co-creation As An Empirical Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Ecosystems of Co-Creation

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Despite the abundant literature about SI, the notion may be blurred too much in the current policy debate [56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73]. As Mihci [74] (p. 18) highlights, insofar as "many theoretical approaches, ideas and practices labelled under the category of SI have relatively little in common", such a vagueness and fuzziness might make the intervention process even more complex and challenging.…”

Section: Social Innovation (Si)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Democratising Smart Cities? Penta-Helix Multistakeholder Social Innovation Framework

Calzada

2020

Smart Cities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The smart cities policy approach has been intensively implemented in European cities under the Horizon 2020 programme. However, these implementations not only reduce the interdependencies among stakeholders to technocratic Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) models, but also fail to question the identities of strategic stakeholders and how they prioritise their business/social models. These aspects are putting democracy at stake in smart cities. Therefore, this article aims to unfold and operationalise multistakeholders’ policy frameworks from the social innovation perspective by suggesting the ex-novo penta-helix framework—including public, private, academia, civic society, and social entrepreneurs/activists—to extend the triple and quadruple-helix frameworks. Based on fieldwork action research conducted from February 2017 to December 2018—triangulating desk research, 75 interviews, and three validation workshops—this article applies the penta-helix framework to map out five strategic dimensions related to (i) multistakeholder helix framework and (ii) the resulting business/social models comparatively in three follower cities of the H2020-Replicate project: Essen (Germany), Lausanne (Switzerland), and Nilüfer (Turkey). For each case study, the findings reveal: (i) a unique multistakeholder composition, (ii) diverse preferences on business/social models, (iii) a regular presence of the fifth helix as intermediaries, and (iv) the willingness to experiment with democratic arrangements beyond the hegemonic PPP.

show abstract

“…Atualmente, existe um consenso crescente entre profissionais, formuladores de políticas e comunidades de pesquisa de que somente inovações tecnológicas não são capazes de superar os desafios sociais e econômicos que as sociedades modernas estão enfrentando [Terstriep et al 2020]. Nesse sentido, a importância de inovações sociais em abordarem de forma bem-sucedida os desafios sociais, econômicos, políticos e ambientais tem sido reconhecida globalmente [Domanski et al 2019].…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Um Estudo Exploratório sobre Plataformas Digitais para Ecossistemas de Inovação Social no Brasil

Chueri¹,

Afonso²,

Pinheiro³

et al. 2020

Anais Do Workshop Sobre Aspectos Sociais, Humanos E Econômicos De Software (WASHES 2020)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to the growing need for allowing different social innovation project actors to work in a coordinated and collaborative manner, the use of digital platforms has been considered as a great opportunity for social innovation ecosystems. However, in addition to technical issues, the existing challenges in the design and management of such platforms are combined with economic and social issues. This paper presents an exploratory study on real social innovation platforms to investigate technical, human and organizational factors. We expected that this study stimulates researchers and professionals to better design and manage such platforms in the context of social innovation.

show abstract

Favourable social innovation ecosystem(s)? – An explorative approach

Cited by 69 publications

References 101 publications

Ecosystems of Co-Creation

Ecosystems of Co-Creation

Democratising Smart Cities? Penta-Helix Multistakeholder Social Innovation Framework

Um Estudo Exploratório sobre Plataformas Digitais para Ecossistemas de Inovação Social no Brasil

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About