Favors from facebook friends

Jung, Yumi; Gray, Rebecca; Lampe, Cliff; Ellison, Nicole B.

doi:10.1145/2470654.2470657

Cited by 32 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…(1) Removal of friend list as during the testing phase the discussions with the participants echoed the results of previous studies [9,15,16,66,68], which illustrated that the interactions of individuals that are "friends" are less antagonistic than the ones that were not friends. This is also been observed to varying degrees in the literature as friendships in social media result in bonding and less antagonism [50]. 2Limiting the users' ability to see and interact with moments and other users only to 500 m from their physical locations as our previous studies [48,55] showcased that individuals that were physically present in a particular when posting moments or interacting with others were more "bonded" and involved with that particular area rather than posting from far away.…”

Section: Design Processmentioning

confidence: 56%

Performing the Digital Self

Papangelis

Chamberlain

Lykourentzou

et al. 2020

ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Expressions of territoriality have been positioned as one of the main reasons users alter their behaviors and perceptions of spatiality and sociality while engaging with location-based social networks (LBSN). Despite the potential for this interplay to further our understanding of LBSN usage in the context of identity, very little work has actually been done toward this. Addressing this gap in the literature is one of the chief aims of the article. Drawing on an original 6-week study with 42 participants utilizing a bespoke LBSN entitled "GeoMoments," our research explores the following: (1) the way that territoriality is linked to self-identity; and (2) how this interplay affects the interactions between users as well as the environments they inhabit. Our findings suggest that participants affirmed their self-identity by selectively posting and claiming ownership of their neighborhood through the LBSN. Here, the locative decisions are made related to risk, hierarchies, and the users' relationship to the area. This practice then led participants to discover and interact with the digital information overlaying their physical environments in a playful manner. These interactions demonstrate the perceived power structures that are facilitated by identity claims over a virtual area. In the main, our results reaffirm that territoriality is a central concept in understanding LBSN use, while also drawing attention to the temporality involved in user-to-user and user-to-place interactions pertaining to physical place mediated by LBSN. CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → User studies; Field studies;

show abstract

Section: Design Processmentioning

confidence: 56%

Performing the Digital Self

Papangelis

Chamberlain

Lykourentzou

et al. 2020

ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We employed factor analysis to cluster sets of questions about engagement, in order to find significant differences in the patterns of the data. Factor loadings were derived through principal component decomposition [15] and then rotated using the varimax (orthogonal) rotation, following a similar approach as in [13,18].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

You Watch, You Give, and You Engage

Xia

Heo

et al. 2018

Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

221

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite gaining traction in North America, live streaming has not reached the popularity it has in China, where livestreaming has a tremendous impact on the social behaviors of users. To better understand this socio-technological phenomenon, we conducted a mixed methods study of live streaming practices in China. We present the results of an online survey of 527 live streaming users, focusing on their broadcasting or viewing practices and the experiences they find most engaging. We also interviewed 14 active users to explore their motivations and experiences. Our data revealed the different categories of content that was broadcasted and how varying aspects of this content engaged viewers. We also gained insight into the role reward systems and fan group-chat play in engaging users, while also finding evidence that both viewers and streamers desire deeper channels and mechanisms for interaction in addition to the commenting, gifting, and fan groups that are available today.

show abstract

“…Beaudoin (2007) considered social support to be an outcome of social capital for residents of New Orleans after hurricane Katrina (see also Beaudoin & Tao, 2007, 2008. In addition, both bridging and bonding capital correspond with the number of responses people receive to requests for favors on Facebook (Jung, Gray, Lampe, & Ellison, 2013). Social capital and received support are not isomorphic, however, because people's beliefs about potentially available resources and what transpires in an interaction do not always match (Sarason et al, 1990;Uchino et al, 2011).…”

Section: Snss Supportive Communication and Social Capitalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Receiving supportive communication from Facebook friends: A model of social ties and supportive communication in social network sites

High

Buehler

2017

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study distinguishes perceptions of, preferences for, and outcomes related to people’s social ties online. It expands understanding of when and why using social network sites (SNSs) provides people with several types of supportive communication by integrating users’ social capital and preference for weak tie support. Prior research is synthesized and extended to build a heuristic model of social ties and supportive communication in SNSs that considers network-based variables (i.e., social capital, preference for weak ties) as mechanisms that link the use of SNSs to the supportive messages people receive. A community sample (N = 553) completed an online questionnaire. Results indicated that intensity of Facebook use corresponds with both social capital and received support. Moreover, social capital mediates and preference for weak ties moderates the relationship between using Facebook and receiving support, and results differ according to the types of social capital and support under consideration. Facebook use, for example, only corresponds with receiving informational and esteem support when users exhibit sufficient preferences for weak tie support.

show abstract

Favors from facebook friends

Cited by 32 publications

References 18 publications

Performing the Digital Self

Performing the Digital Self

You Watch, You Give, and You Engage

Receiving supportive communication from Facebook friends: A model of social ties and supportive communication in social network sites

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About