2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Favorite son? Specialized child laborers and students in poor LDC households

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the extent that people's leadership qualities increase the chance of labor market participation and these uncontrolled attributes are the same characteristics that determine their ability to participate in household issues, uninstrumented work status is expected to have a larger effect than the one estimated with instruments. This result is in line with Horowitz and Wang (2004). Figures also indicate that the levels of statistical significance or signs corresponding to the other explanatory variables are not affected by the use of the instrumented work status.…”
Section: Specific Household Issues: Effects Of Attributessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…To the extent that people's leadership qualities increase the chance of labor market participation and these uncontrolled attributes are the same characteristics that determine their ability to participate in household issues, uninstrumented work status is expected to have a larger effect than the one estimated with instruments. This result is in line with Horowitz and Wang (2004). Figures also indicate that the levels of statistical significance or signs corresponding to the other explanatory variables are not affected by the use of the instrumented work status.…”
Section: Specific Household Issues: Effects Of Attributessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Among the policy options discussed are banning child labor and/or sanctioning countries that allow the practice. These types of policy responses have been widely debated among economists (see e.g., Emerson and Knabb, 2006, 2005, 2004Horowitz and Wang, 2004;Basu, 2002;Dessy and Pallage, 2001;Baland and Robinson, 2000;Dessy, 2000;Basu and Van, 1998). Most of these studies emphasize the trade-off between child labor and human capital accumulation to justify policy interventions, arguing that there are large negative consequences from child labor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have highlighted the comparative advantage or specialization of a child for a particular activity (see, for example, Horowitz & Wang, 2004;Edmonds, 2005). If the productivity of household or market work differs by the sex and birth position of a child in the household, then there must be a correlation between child labour and birth order (Edmonds, 2005).…”
Section: Comparative Advantages or Child Specializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, comparative advantages could dictate how parents make differential decisions over allocating labour activities to some children and schooling for others. Horowitz & Wang (2004) described such decision-making as intra-household specialization of heterogeneous children between the labour market and human capital accumulation.…”
Section: Comparative Advantages or Child Specializationmentioning
confidence: 99%