2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.581954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Favorable Conditions for Genomic Evaluation to Outperform Classical Pedigree Evaluation Highlighted by a Proof-of-Concept Study in Poplar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(108 reference statements)
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spearman's rank correlations may have amplified the benefits of genomic models in black poplar (Pégard et al, 2020) whereas in Norway spruce they were similar between pedigree-based and genomic-based models (Chen et al, 2019), coinciding with our results.…”
Section: Predictive Ability Predictive Accuracy and Spearman Rank Correlationssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Spearman's rank correlations may have amplified the benefits of genomic models in black poplar (Pégard et al, 2020) whereas in Norway spruce they were similar between pedigree-based and genomic-based models (Chen et al, 2019), coinciding with our results.…”
Section: Predictive Ability Predictive Accuracy and Spearman Rank Correlationssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…(Ukrainetz and Mansfield, 2020). Given that the correlation between an individual phenotype and its true breeding value cannot be larger than the square root of heritability, r 2 is recognized as an unbiased estimation of accuracy of selection from n-fold-cross validation (Legarra et al, 2008;Meuwissen et al, 2013), thus r 2 has begun to be more standard used in forest tree GS studies (Lenz et al, 2019(Lenz et al, , 2020Calleja-Rodríguez et al, 2020;Klápšte et al, 2020;Pégard et al, 2020;Zhou et al, 2020). Similar r 1 were observed, for all models and traits evaluated for Scots pine, which agrees with previous studies (Bouvet et al, 2016;de Almeida Filho et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2019), but differs from other eucalyptus reports in which the genomic models performed better (Tan et al, 2018), yet in the same study inconsistencies in the original pedigree were detected, and a pseudo-pedigree was used.…”
Section: Predictive Ability Predictive Accuracy and Spearman Rank Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The population used in the study included 1009 individuals from the French breeding population of Populus nigra (Pégard et al, 2020). All of them were genotyped with a 12k Infinium array (Faivre-Rampant et al, 2016) resulting in 5253 usable SNP markers after quality and frequency filtering (minor allele frequency higher than 0.05).…”
Section: Genomic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting genotypes were phased, imputed and a consensus recombination map derived (Pégard et al, 2019) by using FImpute software (Sargolzaei et al, 2014). The allelic effects were estimated from a genomic multitrait evaluation using breedR (Muñoz & Sanchez, 2020). In this study, we considered the trunk circumference as a focal trait.…”
Section: Genomic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%