2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/bigdata.2018.8622344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FauxBuster: A Content-free Fauxtography Detector Using Social Media Comments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-FauxBuster: A random walk based network embedding solution particularly designed to detect fauxtography posts on social media using user comments [54]. -Fake Image: A feature engineering based approach to detect fake images on social media using a decision tree classifier [13].…”
Section: Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…-FauxBuster: A random walk based network embedding solution particularly designed to detect fauxtography posts on social media using user comments [54]. -Fake Image: A feature engineering based approach to detect fake images on social media using a decision tree classifier [13].…”
Section: Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current solutions leveraging user comments only focus on the textual contents but ignore the replying pattern of user comments [27,10]. Previous work [54] adopted the random walk based algorithms to extract the topological features of the user comment network. We observe that the topological feature of the comment structure identified by such an approach is often insufficient and over-simplified, which leads to suboptimal performance in detecting fauxtography posts with complex user comment networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second category is commonly referred to as "image forgery detection" schemes. For example, Zhang et al developed a novel fauxtography detector that can effectively track down misleading images on social media (e.g., Twitter, Reddit) [28]. Huynh-Kha et al developed an image forgery detection scheme that can detect whether an image is manually edited by copy-move, splicing or both in the same image [29].…”
Section: Misinformation Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these challenges, we map the meta-path collections of both images and poems into a homogeneous latent feature subspace with much lower dimensions. In particular, we embed each meta-path using the auto-encoding technique [29]. It consists of an encoder that maps an input vector X into a latent subspace Z and a decoder that uses the latent representation Z to recover the original input.…”
Section: Semantic Enriched Meta Path Ranking (Sempr) Modulementioning
confidence: 99%