2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2018.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faut-il annoncer un diagnostic de trouble bipolaire à un patient qui n’a jamais connu la dépression ? Une revue systématique actualisée sur la manie récurrente

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We carried out an additional, post hoc, non-systematic search on Google Scholar to check whether additional studies were retrievable. We performed also a manual search of the reference lists of four relevant reviews (Angst, 2015 ; Angst & Grobler, 2015 ; Dondé, Lepetit, & Lavigne, 2019 ; Yazıcı, 2014 ). We completed the preliminary screening based on titles and abstracts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We carried out an additional, post hoc, non-systematic search on Google Scholar to check whether additional studies were retrievable. We performed also a manual search of the reference lists of four relevant reviews (Angst, 2015 ; Angst & Grobler, 2015 ; Dondé, Lepetit, & Lavigne, 2019 ; Yazıcı, 2014 ). We completed the preliminary screening based on titles and abstracts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing number of scientific papers, however, argue that unipolar mania (UM), i.e., mania without depression, as opposed to bipolar disorder with both depression and mania (DM), warrants a separate diagnosis. The most recent comprehensive reviews argue strongly that UM is substantially different from DM and should be seen as an entity of its own [ 7 9 ]. A study by Merikangas [ 10 ] suggests a possible independent familial transmission of mania and depression, thus questioning the bipolar unity, while a recent study using UK biobank data found “key differences” between UM and DM [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of UM remains debated, but there is a call for consensus regarding needed number of manic episodes and follow-up time [ 9 ]. One review recommends using the definition of at least two manic episodes as “possible UM” and at least four manic episodes as “probable UM” [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%