1932
DOI: 10.1130/gsab-43-725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faunal Correlation of the Ellenburger Limestone of Texas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to Portnoy (1987) and Ruppel & Kerans (1987), stromatolite mounds in this vicinity were reported by Comstock (1889, p. 301) and Dake & Bridge (1932, p. 726–727) (see Appendix S1). This section was also described by Cloud & Barnes (1948, p. 136, 146–147), mentioned by Johns et al .…”
Section: Localitiessupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to Portnoy (1987) and Ruppel & Kerans (1987), stromatolite mounds in this vicinity were reported by Comstock (1889, p. 301) and Dake & Bridge (1932, p. 726–727) (see Appendix S1). This section was also described by Cloud & Barnes (1948, p. 136, 146–147), mentioned by Johns et al .…”
Section: Localitiessupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The Moore Hollow Group is divided into the lower, more siliciclastic, Riley Formation and the upper, more carbonate, Wilberns Formation (Barnes & Bell, 1977). In central Texas, the Wilberns is divided into the Welge, Morgan Creek, Point Peak and San Saba members (Dake & Bridge, 1932; Romberg & Barnes, 1944; Bridge et al ., 1947; Barnes & Bell, 1977) (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At one time it was assumed that beds of mid-Canadian age were particularly characterized by this form of gastropod, and one could speak of an "Eccyliomphalus gyroceras zone" (see for example Dake and Bridge 1932). Although this particular zone may have some merit, a number of similarly open coiled species are known throughout the early and middle Paleozoic.…”
Section: Figsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Before those, as discussed previously, identification was based primarily on the annulate habit of the genotype (Billings 1859(Billings , 1865Cullison 1944;de Koninck 1898;Dake and Bridge 1932;Poulsen 1937;Rauff 1894;van Kempen 1978;Walcott 1886). Archaeoscyphia boltoni (Rigby and Nitecki 1973;and personal observation of type material), however, is weakly annulate, and assignment to that genus seems to have been pristacked, and slope gently towards the base (GSC syntype 73-75), as in Archaeoscyphia, or flex upward subtly, culminating roughly at the surface of trab pinnation (paratype GSC 54839).…”
Section: Canal Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%