1971
DOI: 10.1016/0011-7471(71)90017-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faunal and solution patterns of planktonic Foraminifera in surface sediments of the South Pacific

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
119
0
6

Year Published

1971
1971
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
11
119
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This morphotype is also found into the Pleistocene at Site 847 in the eastern equatorial Pacific (Chaisson, 1996). The stratigraphic integrity of pulleniatinid morphotypes seems to decline in regions that are ecologically suboptimal for this genus, with the western equatorial Pacific being the optimal region for this genus (Parker and Berger, 1971). …”
Section: Pulleniatinamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This morphotype is also found into the Pleistocene at Site 847 in the eastern equatorial Pacific (Chaisson, 1996). The stratigraphic integrity of pulleniatinid morphotypes seems to decline in regions that are ecologically suboptimal for this genus, with the western equatorial Pacific being the optimal region for this genus (Parker and Berger, 1971). …”
Section: Pulleniatinamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The modern planktonic foraminifer lysocline (Parker and Berger, 1971) lies at about 2000 meters in the area of the Japan Trench (based on the preservation of planktonic species in all samples examined from the core-top data). The carbonate-compensation depth (CCD) lies at about 3500 meters.…”
Section: Foraminifer Bathymetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results suggest that the faunal variation between nearby sites from water depths at or below the lysocline (Parker and Berger, 1971) is equal to the faunal variatior between adjacent samples from within a core. Faunal variation resulting from varying degrees of preferential preservation may resemble the results due to climatic fluctuations and criteria are needed which will allow the recognition·of foraminiferal changes responsive .-to these two factors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%