2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faulty feeder detection based on the integrated inner product under high impedance fault for small resistance to ground systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the method based on feeder ZSC amplitude [5][6][7][8][9][10], the proposed method is simple and requires less automation in the distribution network; compared with the method using neutral ZSC [12][13][14], the proposed method does not require additional measurement and communication devices; compared with the method using busbar ZSV [15][16][17], the proposed method overcomes the problem that busbar ZSV is difficult to measure under SPHIF and has more practical engineering value; and compared with the method based on waveform nonlinear characteristics [23][24][25][26][27][28], the proposed method is still applicable under faults with weak nonlinear characteristics and has higher reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with the method based on feeder ZSC amplitude [5][6][7][8][9][10], the proposed method is simple and requires less automation in the distribution network; compared with the method using neutral ZSC [12][13][14], the proposed method does not require additional measurement and communication devices; compared with the method using busbar ZSV [15][16][17], the proposed method overcomes the problem that busbar ZSV is difficult to measure under SPHIF and has more practical engineering value; and compared with the method based on waveform nonlinear characteristics [23][24][25][26][27][28], the proposed method is still applicable under faults with weak nonlinear characteristics and has higher reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al proposed inverse-time overcurrent protection for distribution networks with high sensitivity but complex protection calibration [6,7]; Ren et al used longitudinal differential protection commonly used for transmission lines for distribution networks [8,9], but the method is only applicable to distribution networks with a high degree of automation; and Lin et al proposed centralized protection that integrates the amplitude and phase characteristics of each feeder's ZSC [10,11]. Using the healthy feeder ZSC and neutral ZSC phase difference of about 90 • , the faulty feeder ZSC, and neutral ZSC is approximately opposite, Sheng et al used the projection of the feeder ZSC on the neutral ZSC and the difference of the neutral ZSC for faulty feeder detection [12]; Yang et al constructed the protection action criterion by comparing the projection of the feeder ZSC on the neutral ZSC with the neutral ZSC to obtain the projection factor [13]; Wang et al proposed to calculate the integrated inner product of feeder ZSC and neutral ZSC, after that, the sign and magnitude of the integrated inner product of each feeder are compared to detect the faulty feeder [14]; however, all three methods mentioned above require additional equipment to measure or transmit the neutral ZSC. Using the characteristics that the bus zero-sequence voltage (ZSV) amplitude is inversely proportional to the fault transition resistance value and positively proportional to the feeder ZSC amplitude, Li et al proposed a method based on ZSV amplitude correction [15]; Xue et al proposed a method for ZSV ratio braking [16]; Long et al used the amount of change in zero-sequence power before and after the feeder fault to highlight the feeder fault characteristics [17]; however, the ZSV required by the above protection methods is difficult to measure under SPHIF.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the detection cases, μPMUs obtain voltage and current phasor measurements for HIF detection. In most HIF detection results, the ground resistances are between 100 Ω and 2 kΩ [5], [6], [39]. The grounding resistance of many HIFs in the initial fault stage is often greater than 1 kΩ or 3 kΩ.…”
Section: A Simulation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference 12 proposed a highly sensitive zero sequence stage overcurrent protection method, which decomposes the existing zero sequence overcurrent protection into multiple fixed time limit overcurrent protection, which can ensure the sensitivity of protection during high resistance grounding and the selectivity of protection during low resistance grounding, with the resistance to fault resistance of up to 1500 Ω. Reference 13 proposed a high resistance fault detection method for low resistance grounded networks based on integrated inner product transformation. The inner product principle is used to highlight the difference between fault outgoing line and non‐fault outgoing line, but the neutral point current needs to be measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%