Faulty Environments and Risk Reasoning: The Local Understanding of Industrial Hazards

Abstract

Building upon a detailed empirical analysis of the local understanding of hazards in one geographical area, in this paper we offer a critique of both the psychometric and 'risk society' approaches to the relationship between lay and scientific groups. Specifically, we explore the connection between lay understandings of risk and the contexts of their development and application with regard to one industrial hazard site in northeast England. Rather than presenting local knowledges as fixed or separable from cultural practices and social worldviews, we examine the relational and active construction of environmental understandings-noting the significance of such factors as local memory, observation and evidence, definitions of expertise, risk and credibility, and moral discourses. The paper concludes with a discussion of the relationship between knowledge, understanding, and context. We also consider the wider significance of this case study both for environmental policy and for more theoretical treatments of science and its publics. p

An Array of Deficits: Unpacking NIMBY Discourses in Wind Energy Developers' Conceptualizations of Their Local Opponents

“…A raft of studies has sought to provide more sophisticated understandings of support and opposition to the siting of diverse RETs (see Devine-Wright ed 2011), indicating the significance of place attachment (Devine-Wright 2009), symbolic interpretations of both the place and the technology (McLachlan 2010), and the range of political, social, and environmental values (Kempton et al 2005) that inform stances of opposition and support. In addition, the wider literature on land use disputes has long acknowledged the roles that features of planning and decisionmaking processes along with relationships between local people and those responsible for planning, building, and managing developments have in the generation of oppositional stances (e.g., Kemp 1990;Irwin et al 1999). On the basis of such research Gibson argues: ''For all these reasons it is time for progressive activists and critical sociologists to begin living without NIMBY' ' (2005, 396).…”

Combining Expert and Stakeholder Knowledge to Define Water Management Priorities in the Mékrou River Basin

“…Although it is usually assumed that experts have an objective view driven by scientific facts, models and methods [9], we demonstrate here that their opinions may be (partially) For three sectors (agriculture, fishing and industry), there are no substantial differences between countries, although Benin ranks first for each sector in terms of percentage of "strongly relevant" answers.…”

“…While experts hold scientific knowledge that is based on scientific facts, models and methods [9], the knowledge of stakeholders is based on experiences related to context or location [10], and provides local insights related to their daily activities. In this context, Edelenbos [11] analyzed the co-production of knowledge by experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in two Dutch water-management projects.…”

Las dimensiones sociales de la percepción de la energía nuclear. Un análisis del caso español (1960-2015)

“…Desde esta perspectiva, no es fácil separar las percepciones de riesgo del contexto social, económico o político en el que se producen (Walker et al 1998;Irwin et al 1999;Van Loon 2000). Así, el hecho de que una población no proteste contra un riesgo no implica necesariamente que lo acepte sin más, sino que puede que sus relaciones de dependencia (social, psicológica, económica, política) con las instituciones involucradas en la promoción y/o gestión del riesgo les impida hacer visible su rechazo (Wynne 1996).…”