2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6171.2001.tb00305.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faulty Assumptions Associated With the Use of Restraints With Children

Abstract: Alternatives to restraints must be investigated and developed to replace the current reactive, crisis-management orientation of practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, no quantitative studies until the present have examined the extent to which weight restoration is facilitated by the use of physical restraint, that is, the use of physical force to restrict or control the patient. In the literature, the general view is that interventions involving physical restraint have no inherent therapeutic effects in the treatment of children and adolescents [5] and may be associated with negative psychological outcomes [6,7]. However, the literature has largely concerned itself with physical restraint to manage patient aggression [8,9], and therefore may not generalize to physical restraint utilized to administer nutrition in ED.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, no quantitative studies until the present have examined the extent to which weight restoration is facilitated by the use of physical restraint, that is, the use of physical force to restrict or control the patient. In the literature, the general view is that interventions involving physical restraint have no inherent therapeutic effects in the treatment of children and adolescents [5] and may be associated with negative psychological outcomes [6,7]. However, the literature has largely concerned itself with physical restraint to manage patient aggression [8,9], and therefore may not generalize to physical restraint utilized to administer nutrition in ED.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the application of these restrictive interventions is fraught with challenges. For example, critics have cited the lack of evidence for long-term benefits, potential physical injury, and psychological harm resulting from seclusion and restraint, along with the absence of a sound and empirically based theory underpinning the application of these techniques (e.g., Measham, 1995; Mohr & Anderson, 2001; Mohr, Mahon, & Noone, 1998). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%