Proceedings. 19th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (Cat. No.99CB37003)
DOI: 10.1109/icdcs.1999.776526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault tolerant video on demand services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their system can only tolerate single server failure and does not provide real-time recovery when a server fails. Anker et al [11] presented a fault tolerant video on demand service by using multiple servers. Their system is built up on a group communication system called Transis, thus when a server crashes it is replaced by another server in a transparent way.…”
Section: 2fault-tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, their system can only tolerate single server failure and does not provide real-time recovery when a server fails. Anker et al [11] presented a fault tolerant video on demand service by using multiple servers. Their system is built up on a group communication system called Transis, thus when a server crashes it is replaced by another server in a transparent way.…”
Section: 2fault-tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies [10][11][12][13] have investigated the continuous service provision in the presence of server failure. Bolosky et al [10] proposed the tiger video server which used data mirroring to achieve fault tolerance.…”
Section: 2fault-tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in contrast to partitionable systems, in primary-partition systems, such merge and split operations are not allowed -i.e., only a single partition can exist and all the non-faulty processes are required to agree on the composition of that partition [6], [26]. Collaborative applications [11], resource allocation management [7], and distributed monitoring [23] are examples of applications that support partitioning. Partitions may experiment with some eventual stability so that the liveness of the computation can be guaranteed -i.e., a stability period lasts long enough in order to eventually allow all the participant nodes of the partition to communicate in a timely manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…View-oriented group communication systems are especially useful for constructing fault-tolerant applications that consistently maintain replicated state of some sort (examples include Keidar and Dolev 1996;Fekete et al 2001;Sussman and Marzullo 1998;Anker et al 1999;Khazan et al 1998;Friedman and Vaysburg 1997;Guerraoui and Schiper 1997b]). Such applications greatly benefit from virtually synchronous communication semantics (for example, [Moser et al· 3 WAN, as compared to the relative consistency of message latency in a local-area network (LAN).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%