Design, Automation &Amp; Test in Europe Conference &Amp; Exhibition (DATE), 2014 2014
DOI: 10.7873/date2014.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault-tolerant control synthesis and verification of distributed embedded systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternately, u * [k] can also be derived using other compensation strategies (see [12]). The above discussions indicate that the underlying plant dynamics is given by (6) in the nominal mode, (16) in the skip mode, and (19) in the abort mode.…”
Section: B Implementation Of the Overrun Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alternately, u * [k] can also be derived using other compensation strategies (see [12]). The above discussions indicate that the underlying plant dynamics is given by (6) in the nominal mode, (16) in the skip mode, and (19) in the abort mode.…”
Section: B Implementation Of the Overrun Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to a switched control system whose stability has been analyzed using Multiple Lyapunov Functions [5], [11], Norm-based approaches [11], and common quadratic Lyapunov functions [6], [8], [12], [13].…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another body of research that studies the impact of missed control action on stability and performance is platform-aware formal veriication of control software [55], [56], [72], [73]. Here, an embedded platform architecture is represented as a network of time-stamped event count automata (TS-ECA) where each message is stamped with a time as it moves from one buffer to another.…”
Section: ) Robust-control-aware Platform Design and Veriicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such failures can be caused e.g. by an unreliable communication system connecting sensors, controllers and actuators (Kauer et al (2014)), or since the control input is calculated on a microprocessor that runs many different tasks in parallel, such that the on-time calculation of the control input cannot always be guaranteed (Bernat et al (2001); Årzén et al (2005)). Nevertheless, it is important to guarantee stability of the control system despite the unreliable feedback channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%