2015
DOI: 10.1109/cjece.2015.2406665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Ride-Through Capability Improvement of DFIG-Based Wind Turbine by Employing a Voltage-Compensation-Type Active SFCL

Abstract: Based on the considerations in creating a smart grid roadmap, an integrated application of renewable energy sources and superconducting power devices may bring more positive effects. This paper suggests a voltage-compensation-type active superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) to enhance the fault ride-through capability of doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) for wind power generation. Since the active SFCL has higher controllability and flexibility than a common resistive-or inductive-type SFCL, its ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In principle, the introduction of these two superconducting devices will increase the investment costs, and meanwhile it should be noted that, the enhancement of the PV system's transient performance can as well cause some considerable benefits, such as the reduction of the DC-link overvoltage for protecting the capacitor, improvement of the PCC power for ensuring the utilization efficiency of renewable energy, stabilization of the supply load for avoiding the energy outage. All of these benefits resulted from the SFCL-SMES can translate into economic values [69]. Therefore, it is meaningful and valuable to carry out the optimization design of the two superconducting devices, and studying how to guarantee the techno-economics of the SFCL-SMES may become critical.…”
Section: Optimization Methods For the Superconducting Fault Current LImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, the introduction of these two superconducting devices will increase the investment costs, and meanwhile it should be noted that, the enhancement of the PV system's transient performance can as well cause some considerable benefits, such as the reduction of the DC-link overvoltage for protecting the capacitor, improvement of the PCC power for ensuring the utilization efficiency of renewable energy, stabilization of the supply load for avoiding the energy outage. All of these benefits resulted from the SFCL-SMES can translate into economic values [69]. Therefore, it is meaningful and valuable to carry out the optimization design of the two superconducting devices, and studying how to guarantee the techno-economics of the SFCL-SMES may become critical.…”
Section: Optimization Methods For the Superconducting Fault Current LImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mainly, two types of FCLs are extensively applied in power systems: non-superconducting [10][11][12][13] and superconducting [14][15][16][17][18][19]. Superconducting FCLs have been applied in different parts of the power network such as renewable power generation, distribution generation, transmission system, distribution network [18,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Also, non-superconducting types FCLs have been employed in several branches of power system such as generation, transmission, distribution network for improving dynamic performance by limiting fault current [10,12,[31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Superconducting and Non-superconducting Fclsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-superconducting FCL Transmission Line [20][21][22] Distributed Generation [18,23,24] Distribution Network [28][29][30] Renewable Energy [25][26][27] Transmission Line [31] Distributed Generation [32,33] Distribution Network [35] Renewable Energy [10,12,34] Both superconducting FCL and non-superconducting FCL have been extensively applied in transmission and distribution networks and renewable energy systems for different purposes such as stability enhancement, protection improvement, fault current reduction and fault ride through capability enhancement. Main advantages and disadvantages of superconducting and non-superconducting FCLs are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Fcl Superconducting Fclmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 9. (a) The superconducting fault current limiter-magnetic energy storage system (SFCL-MES) [33,34]; and (b) the active superconducting fault current limiter [35]. (a) The superconducting fault current limiter-magnetic energy storage system (SFCL-MES) [33,34]; and (b) the active superconducting fault current limiter [35].…”
Section: Inductive Type Fcl: Superconducting Fault Current Limiter-mamentioning
confidence: 99%