2010
DOI: 10.1029/2008tc002415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault interaction and stresses along broad oceanic transform zone: Tjörnes Fracture Zone, north Iceland

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Paleomagnetic sites are located in four main study localities (coherent blocks) with increasing distance away from the major offshore Húsavík‐Flatey Fault (HFF) Zone, and four subsidiary study localities adjacent to the fault zone to assess directional consistency and distinguish between different deformational models. These data may be relevant to the interpretation of deformation adjacent to major oceanic transforms and have implications on the tectonic evolution of northern Iceland, (Bergerat, Angelier, & Homberg, ; Bergerat, Angelier, & Villemin, ; Garcia et al, ; Homberg et al, ; Sæmundsson, ; Young et al, ). Collectively, the results and available structural data show that deformation in northern Iceland is considerably more complex than can be accounted for by typical deformation models from strike‐slip fault zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paleomagnetic sites are located in four main study localities (coherent blocks) with increasing distance away from the major offshore Húsavík‐Flatey Fault (HFF) Zone, and four subsidiary study localities adjacent to the fault zone to assess directional consistency and distinguish between different deformational models. These data may be relevant to the interpretation of deformation adjacent to major oceanic transforms and have implications on the tectonic evolution of northern Iceland, (Bergerat, Angelier, & Homberg, ; Bergerat, Angelier, & Villemin, ; Garcia et al, ; Homberg et al, ; Sæmundsson, ; Young et al, ). Collectively, the results and available structural data show that deformation in northern Iceland is considerably more complex than can be accounted for by typical deformation models from strike‐slip fault zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Geodetic monitoring of deformation [57] [58] and earthquakes [59] [60] [61], covering short-term tectonic activities. 3) Stress analysis [62] [63] [64], and a first comprehensive stress map [65]. 4) Topical features such as local fault geometry and fault termination [66].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the lineament is seismically defined (P. Einarsson, ; Rögnvaldsson et al, ), there is little field evidence for a through‐going transform fault other than a linear topographic depression. It is therefore unlikely that the Dalvík fault has accommodated large displacement (P. Einarsson, ; Gudmundsson et al, ; Homberg et al, ).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ages of these three major lineaments within the Tjörnes Fracture Zone seem to decrease toward the northeast (Gudmundsson et al, ; Homberg et al, ). Models of GPS data support this hypothesis—two thirds of present‐day plate motion is accommodated on the northeastern‐most Grímsey fault with only a third on the central Húsavík‐Flatey fault (Metzger et al, ).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%