2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICACCCN) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icacccn.2018.8748585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Injection Techniques - A Brief Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fault injection techniques have been extensively researched in the particular field of software and computer systems, e.g., [12]. However, fault injection in physics-based models of hydraulic systems and components is still rarely addressed.…”
Section: Model-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fault injection techniques have been extensively researched in the particular field of software and computer systems, e.g., [12]. However, fault injection in physics-based models of hydraulic systems and components is still rarely addressed.…”
Section: Model-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, backward snowballing was performed [21], meaning that the references of the found pieces of literature were screened in hopes of discovering additional publications. The literature search process identified six peer-reviewed papers [3,4,10,12,14,16].…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The point of this is to ensure the authenticity and relevance of the experiments. The alternative, to run Chaos Experiments in testing environments, can be inferior since a testing environment does not always capture all aspects of a complete system running in production [10]. For instance, behavior of real users and synthetic users may differ [3].…”
Section: Chaos Engineering Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a simulation framework, faults can be injected using a set of input patterns via an automated FI code or FI dashboard in hardware or software. Several surveys studied FI methodologies [3,[6][7][8][9]. Briefly, FI techniques can be categorized into four methodologies: (1) physical fault injections, including hardware-based fault injection (HaFI) and software-based fault injection (SoFI) methods; (2) simulation-based fault injection (SiFI) methods; (3) emulation-based fault injection (EmFI) methods; and (4) hybrid fault injection (HyFI) methods [4,6,8,10].…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SiFI supports the adaptation of tests to a variety of traffic scenarios and avoids costly or dangerous physical FI in the real world [11]. SiFI has a low cost, high controllability, high safety, and high fault coverage [9]. SiFI is categorized into three different subcategories in the literature: the simulation command technique, simulation code modification technique, and simulation modification technique with different levels of abstraction [5].…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%