29th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC'05)
DOI: 10.1109/compsac.2005.78
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Injection Approach Based on Dependence Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the existing approaches use an architectural model for performing dependency analysis and to guide fault injection [23,24]. Another approach, for the purpose of robustness testing, analyses the software architecture for identifying where each type of fault may occur, for the purpose of selecting the specific testing techniques to be used [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the existing approaches use an architectural model for performing dependency analysis and to guide fault injection [23,24]. Another approach, for the purpose of robustness testing, analyses the software architecture for identifying where each type of fault may occur, for the purpose of selecting the specific testing techniques to be used [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In testability verification work on the equipment you want to check the UUT (unit under test) the BIT or ATE test and diagnostic capability using fault injection method [1]. As technology advances, the previously manual fault injection method can not meet the work requirements, fault injection automatically technique emerged, automatic fault injection equipment has been the focus of research in this field [2] [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dependency analysis solutions can also be used to explain post-release failures (Nagappan and Ball 2007) and to deliberately insert faults into source code (Moraes et al 2005) to accelerate errors and failures situations. These activities are useful to observe the system's behavior in the presence of faults and therefore identify the source code elements that should be monitored for debugging during the implementation.…”
Section: Quality Assurance Testing and Debuggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ModelBased Behavioral Dependency Analysis (MBBDA) (Garousi et al 2006) derive behavioral dependency information from UML design models. Chart diagrams are also used to identify chaining in class interfaces from class diagrams and support quality assurance and testing activities (Moraes et al 2005;Ryser and Glinz 2000). A final (Korel et al 2002;Jourdan et al 2006;Liangli et al 2006) set of solutions using diagrammatic representations apply formal concept analysis to cluster objects in business process models that can be considered dependent (Ivkovic and Kontogiannis 2006;Vasilache and Tanaka 2005).…”
Section: Diagrammatic Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation