2020
DOI: 10.3906/elk-1908-138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault identification of catenary dropper based on improved CapsNet

Abstract: Traditional fault identification algorithms applied to catenary dropper suffer from various problems due to its small contact area. These problems include misidentification and lower recognition rate of the faulty dropper. Compared with the traditional convolutional neural network, the vector is utilized as the input of the capsule network (CapsNet) for the first time, which can well retain the feature information such as the direction and angle of the target, and is more suitable for identifying the dropper u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the ReLU activation function in the CNN architecture, the squashing operation is added in the capsule, each of which is nested. However, this way, the capsule output is determined as 0 if the input vector is short and 1 if it is long 40,62 …”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the ReLU activation function in the CNN architecture, the squashing operation is added in the capsule, each of which is nested. However, this way, the capsule output is determined as 0 if the input vector is short and 1 if it is long 40,62 …”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this way, the capsule output is determined as 0 if the input vector is short and 1 if it is long. 40,62 Since CapsNet involves nonlinear learning steps, it has a slower training time than CNN for some problems. 63 However, the prediction time is faster than other networks.…”
Section: An Overview Of Capsnet Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%