During continental rifting, extension in the upper parts of the crust is accommodated by brittle faulting. If stretching is distributed evenly throughout the crust (McKenzie, 1978), faulting in the upper crust is balanced by ductile deformation in the lower crust (e.g., Buck, 1991;Kusznir & Karner, 2007). However, at passive margins, subsidence analyzed from geological cross sections differs from expected values when applying the McKenzie uniform stretching model. Such observations led to the development of depth-dependent stretching models (Wernicke, 1985) that account for higher amounts of extension in lower parts of the crust, which permit larger subsidence values. More recent studies of passive margins have suggested ductile crustal flow as an alternative mechanism for removal of lower crustal material. Consequently, mass is not conserved in 2D plane-strain cross sections, which can explain discrepancies between estimated amounts of extension in the upper-and lower crust (P. D. Clift, 2015).Ductile flow in the lower crust should also occur in intracontinental rift settings. Indeed, lower crustal flow is expected in extensional settings where the crustal thickness exceeds 20 km and the upper mantle is strong (McKenzie et al., 2000 and references therein). This phenomenon has been extensively demonstrated in the Basin and Range Province, where flow of the lower crust toward the rift center compensates lateral crustal thickness