2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2019.0179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault exclusion method for ARAIM based on tight GNSS/INS integration to achieve CAT‐I approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It not only provides a navigation solution for the crew, but also monitors the reliability of the navigation output through a series of augmentation techniques [1-6], such as receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM), which is achieved by a consistency check among redundant pseudo-range measurements [7][8][9]. The RAIM monitoring technique has been commonly implemented especially in aerial navigation and air transport area for keeping the safety of the flight [10][11][12][13][14][15], while also being investigated in the maritime navigation field [16][17][18]. The snapshot RAIM process only needs the satellite signals in current epoch for operating and requires no additional aid information beyond the receiver, thus has been widely investigated and employed for the last decades [19][20][21].…”
Section: Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It not only provides a navigation solution for the crew, but also monitors the reliability of the navigation output through a series of augmentation techniques [1-6], such as receiver autonomous integrity monitoring (RAIM), which is achieved by a consistency check among redundant pseudo-range measurements [7][8][9]. The RAIM monitoring technique has been commonly implemented especially in aerial navigation and air transport area for keeping the safety of the flight [10][11][12][13][14][15], while also being investigated in the maritime navigation field [16][17][18]. The snapshot RAIM process only needs the satellite signals in current epoch for operating and requires no additional aid information beyond the receiver, thus has been widely investigated and employed for the last decades [19][20][21].…”
Section: Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state vector bold-italicxk is a 17 × 1 matrix, including INS attitude errors, INS velocity errors, INS position errors, accelerometer biases, gyroscope biases, GNSS receiver clock offsets and drifts. bold-italiczk is the measurement vector, which represents the difference between the pseudo range and pseudo range rate estimated by INS and provided by GNSS receiver [18]. boldΦk/k1, boldΓk1 and bold-italicHk are the state transition matrix, process noise matrix and observation matrix, respectively.…”
Section: Dynamic Fading Filter Optimisation Under Fault‐free Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the hostile environment and hardware damage, many types of faults of sensors will occur, including abrupt, gradual, oscillating [3,7,8], which may cause serious accidents [3]. Hence, the quick detection and isolation of these faults are highly desirable [9,10]. The Chi-square fault detection algorithm is mostly applied to integrated navigation [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%