2019
DOI: 10.3390/sym11101212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Diagnosis System for Induction Motors by CNN Using Empirical Wavelet Transform

Abstract: Detecting the faults related to the operating condition of induction motors is a very important task for avoiding system failure. In this paper, a novel methodology is demonstrated to detect the working condition of a three-phase induction motor and classify it as a faulty or healthy motor. The electrical current signal data is collected for five different types of fault and one normal operating condition of the induction motors. The first part of the methodology illustrates a pattern recognition technique bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C. Lessmeier et al [47] employed wavelet packet decomposition (WPD) for feature extraction and then applied ensemble learning on the motor current signal and achieved an accuracy of 86.03%. A similar type of research conducted in [53] has proposed a fault detection method for induction motors utilizing empirical wavelet transform and CNN achieved 97.37% accuracy, which is also comparable with our result. In [54], authors used a vibration signal and CNN for fault detection and diagnosis, achieving accuracy between 88-99% for different ratios of data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…C. Lessmeier et al [47] employed wavelet packet decomposition (WPD) for feature extraction and then applied ensemble learning on the motor current signal and achieved an accuracy of 86.03%. A similar type of research conducted in [53] has proposed a fault detection method for induction motors utilizing empirical wavelet transform and CNN achieved 97.37% accuracy, which is also comparable with our result. In [54], authors used a vibration signal and CNN for fault detection and diagnosis, achieving accuracy between 88-99% for different ratios of data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Information fusion (IF) and DL approaches were used [51] on a motor current signal, which result almost 98.3% accuracy. Another study on the same dataset applied an empirical wavelet transform and CNN for fault classification, showing 97.37% accuracy [52]. Therefore, by comparison with the recent research on the motor current signal, our approach provides a better result, with greater than 99% accuracy for ensemble classifiers.…”
Section: Accuracy (%)mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…WPD + SVM-PSO [50] 86.03 IF+MLP [51] 98.3 SVM+ IF [51] 98.0 KNN+ IF [51] 97.7 CNN + EWT [52] 97.3 DWT + XGBoost [This paper] 99.3…”
Section: Applied Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Authors [49] propounded a fault identification technique using CNN and FFT for bearing fault detection in induction motor. In [50], authors have propounded a bearing fault diagnosis of induction motor using CNN and empirical WT. Authors [51] investigated the bearing fault diagnosis using CNN model with the help of FFT analysis of vibration and utilizing root mean square data from the FFT analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%