2021
DOI: 10.3390/sym13122366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault-Diagnosis Sensor Selection for Fuel Cell Stack Systems Combining an Analytic Hierarchy Process with the Technique Order Performance Similarity Ideal Solution Method

Abstract: Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods have rapidly developed and have been applied to many areas for decision making in engineering. Apart from that, the process to select fault-diagnosis sensor for Fuel Cell Stack system in various options is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) issue. However, in light of the choosing of fault diagnosis sensors, there is no MCDM analysis, and Fuel Cell Stack companies also urgently need a solution. Therefore, in this paper, we will use MCDM methods to analysis the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the importance of the risk factors and in accordance with AHP [41,42], 30 experts, including professional designers of turnout gear, members of the National Fire Agency and local fire departments, members of the National Police Agency, and scholars of safety management, were asked to fill out a questionnaire (Supplementary Materials); 23 valid responses were collected. Using AHP, 28 risk factors were ordered from high to low risk based on their weight values.…”
Section: Ahp Expert Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the importance of the risk factors and in accordance with AHP [41,42], 30 experts, including professional designers of turnout gear, members of the National Fire Agency and local fire departments, members of the National Police Agency, and scholars of safety management, were asked to fill out a questionnaire (Supplementary Materials); 23 valid responses were collected. Using AHP, 28 risk factors were ordered from high to low risk based on their weight values.…”
Section: Ahp Expert Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One popular method for multi-criteria decision-making is the analytical hierarchy process (AHP), which involves the decomposition of the problem into a hierarchy of objectives, criteria, and alternatives. The AHP then assigns weights to each element in the hierarchy and uses them to rank the alternatives based on their overall desirability [ 23 ]. Figure 7 show the multi-level hierarchical structure for fuel-cell-stack fault-diagnosis sensor criteria weight definition.…”
Section: Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TOPSIS algorithm can be successfully applied for decision-making in different study areas, including complex network analysis [ 44 , 45 ], Internet of Things [ 46 , 47 , 48 ], neural networks [ 49 , 50 , 51 ], reverse logistics [ 52 , 53 ], and sensor selection [ 54 , 55 , 56 ]. According to [ 57 ], the mathematical formulation of the TOPSIS algorithm is composed of the steps: The decision matrix D is represented as The elements of the ordered decision matrix are calculated according to Equation (4).…”
Section: Multiple Criteria Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%